• huginn@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      65
      ·
      7 months ago

      To you.

      The peak of brutality architecture beats any other type in my eyes. It’s beautiful in a way no other building or style compares.

      • Jesus_666@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        7 months ago

        Unfortunately many brutalistic buildings are far off from its peak and just look like lazily designed gray blobs. High-effort brutalism can look good (or can look inappropriately evil but that’s besides the point); low-effort brutalism always looks cheap.

      • onion@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        They look depressing and I hate being around them. A city should be a nice place to live, not a playground for architects’ experiments

        • huginn@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          7 months ago

          I love being around them. Visiting Tokyo right now and there are so many gorgeous concrete buildings.

          The last thing I’d want is to live in a city that was so stuck in the past that all buildings look 100 years old.

          Give me buildings from the 2020s not the 1920s. Give me sleek and light concrete, metal and glass.

          Death to brick and wrought iron.

          • PyroNeurosis
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Damn. I rather like the interwar style of architecture: pretty lines and compelling nuances and decorations. Something to distract myself with as opposed to brutalist architecture.

            • huginn@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              11
              ·
              7 months ago

              Brutalism is beautiful in its simplicity and honesty. Combine that with some green and it’s a 10/10 to me.

              Give me a verdant bunker any day.

        • tetris11@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          A city should be a place for people to live, not some artsy space for real-estate developers to inflate living costs.

          Have your artsy architecture projects, but also have functional buildings too please

    • herrcaptain@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      ·
      7 months ago

      I dunno, I think they’re kinda … neat, I guess? Like, yeah, they’re technically pretty ugly, but somehow in a way that makes them interesting.

        • KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          7 months ago

          I think that was the original idea for brutalist buildings, complementing them with plants? I don’t want to look for a source right now though, so take it with a grain of salt.

        • Biyoo
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Brutalism without greenery does not work well in general. I love the post apocalyptic vibes of a concrete building overgrown by plants.

    • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      It’s the perfect architecture for any of the non-squishy government organizations like the FBI or the Department of Urban Works.

      You, oh lowly peasant should be intimidated in the halls of governance, for you don’t belong here.