Source- but beware, the site is cancer.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    7 months ago

    Cool. You know what I got from sitting in a cheap office chair all day at work?

    Hemorrhoids.

    I’ll take “bed rot.”

    • Coreidan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      7 months ago

      Uhhhh I think you might want to look into your diet. Chairs don’t give hemorrhoids. A bad diet will tho.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m impressed at how much time you spend on lemmy, and how little you spend actually reading any of the articles you get outraged over.

      There is absolutely zero in this article about RTO. It’s all about not working in your bed as that can develop poor sleep habits. It’s all about acting in a way so you get good sleep. Why anyone would get outraged over this or turn this into part of some grand conspiracy between the media and big business to get people back into the office is beyond me.

      Clearly this is what the submitter is attempting to imply. Don’t be so easily played.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        Cool. I didn’t want to read a page full of spammy bullshit, as OP suggested. Sorry that wasn’t okay with you.

        • EatATaco@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 months ago

          You are too easily played. Think for yourself, instead of letting some lemmy poster manipulate you so easily into being outraged with blatantly misrepresentative titles to articles. If you don’t want to read “spammy bullshit” then just don’t read it, but then I suggest you also don’t get outraged over it because the OP is telling you to be outraged. It doesn’t matter if I’m okay with this, you shouldn’t be.

            • EatATaco@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              What this comes down to is that got played by the OP. It’s more important that you take away from this is that you should think for yourself, rather than try to nit-pick over whether you were actually outraged.

              • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                I am sure you have never been tricked in your life, but just because I do get tricked on occasion does not mean I am unable to think for myself. It means I’m not perfect and I’m not smart, two things I have never claimed or pretended to be. And if you think being imperfect and not smart means you are unable to think for yourself, you must not think very highly of your species’ ability to do so. Based on random internet encounters too.

                Anyway, it was an unwarranted insult. I get that you’re better than me, you’ve made that clear, I won’t argue with you. Can we move on?

                • EatATaco@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I am sure you have never been tricked in your life

                  No, I absolutely have. I’ve even been tricked by misleading headlines of articles. What I took away from this, after it happened, was that I should RTFA before responding. Still, sometimes, I don’t, but usually those responses will just be jokes.

                  on occasion does not mean I am unable to think for myself.

                  I hate to break it to you, but I spend too much time on lemmy too, and I see your posts all the time. Quite regularly your comments are in response to some false assumption about the article, that clearly came from the headline. It seems to happen far more than “on occasion.” Slow down. You don’t need to come to an opinion in a flash. Hell, you don’t even need to come to an opinion about it at all. If you don’t want to take the time to read the article, then that should also indicate to you that you shouldn’t rush to an opinion and then take the time to comment on that opinion.

                  • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    I read the article quite often, but not when I’m warned about the website beforehand being full of spammy crap. I assume if I go through your post history, I will never find any occasions where you jumped to any conclusions, right?

                    And yes, I get that you want to keep pointing out I post a lot. I’m tired of explaining why. Let’s just say it involves my health.