• hitmyspot@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 months ago

    It might be that due to so many games getting released, many confuse it for a rerelease or extra content rather than a full game.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It’d be great if we could come back to reasonable naming conventions. Why is “Final Fantasy 7 Remake: Part 2” so unappealing? What even IS an intergrade? I should not have to research or be a… Biologist, apparently, to know what order I need to play your bloody game in.

      Edit: fuckin hell, intergrade isn’t even the 2nd game. I give up.

      • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Publishers dont want numbers in the title anymore because they think consumers will be scared away if they haven’t played the ones that came before.

        Literally reaching past dollars to pick up pennies instead. Everyone I have ever met that has interest in a series with numbered entries always buys the first game, plays it, then decides if they want to keep playing. Companies would be converting consumers to multiple purchases per consumer, but rather are focused only on short term profit and only want you to purchase the new one. Therefore, removal of numbers in game titles.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          7 months ago

          To be fair, you probably should stay away from a part 2, unless you’ve played a part 1. It also doesn’t keep them from releasing final fantasy {insert number here} consistently. It’s vastly short sighted. If I get part 2, which isn’t labeled as a part 2, have no earthly idea what’s happening, and then find out it’s p2, you bet your ASS I’m not buying p1 now lol

          • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            Do people not read reviews before buying games? When I was a kid I’d want games based on the box art. Now I read what the game is about.

            The naming conventions they’re using are still bad, though.

            • Patches@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              The only reviews I trust these days are Steam, Steam Brigades, and Video Game Dunkey. I have to assume everyone else at this point is on payroll. How many 10/10 did Starfield get? Cyberpunk 2077? Wild Hearts? Wo Long? Dragons Dogma 2?

              • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Side note: I went to metacritic to see what Starfield got from reviews. One of them gave it a 5/5 100% rating, but the opening sentence is “Starfield isn’t a perfect game.” Come on guys what do you think 100% means?

                But anyway, yeah, I mostly look at user reviews before buying.

        • Patches@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          I think it’s definitely both. I sure as shit would not pick up God of War 18: Ragnarok as a first entry but plenty of people picked it up just fine not realizing.

          Even just FF7 Remake: Interobang followed by FF7 Remake: Electric Boogaloo would’ve made more sense. They ditched the entire remake part.