• empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    195
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Water and steam just too goddamn convenient. Super high latent heat so it can move a ton of energy with a quick phase change, works at reasonable pressures and temperatures, stays liquid all the time when you want it to so pumps work, and it’s so readily available as to be damn near free. Super cool!

  • Glowstick@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    72
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Solar photovoltaic is the only one i can think of that isn’t just a fancy way to make steam

    EDIT

    ok let’s clarify to say a method that isn’t related to movement of a fluid that spins a turbine. So not windmills (air is a fluid), not hydro, not geothermal, etc.

  • Rossphorus@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Some types of fusion can bypass steam generation and use what’s creatively called Direct Energy Conversion. If the fusion products are charged particles they can be passed through a magnetic field to separate them based on charge and collected onto plates. When you look at the electric potential between the plates you’ve effectively created a voltage, no steam necessary. It’s also theoretically possible to do the same with some types of fission products too.

    • Another Catgirl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I thought they take advantage of the velocity of the charged ions to magnetically transfer power to electromagnetic coils around the reactor.

      • Rossphorus@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        There’s a whole bunch of mechanisms, largely depending on the fusion architecture and the atoms being fused. For tokamak reactors the circular nature lends itself well to what you describe, though usually it’s energy being imparted into the ions to keep them contained and away from the walls. In the ‘standard’ deuterium-tritium fusion model (the easiest to perform) fusion produces a helium nucleus and a neutron, where the neutron gets most of the energy. Since a neutron can’t be contained by magnets it impacts the chamber walls. This heat is wicked away by, you guessed it, cooling water which turns into steam. In order to use a direct energy conversion strategy you need a fusion reaction that produces no neutrons, but we’re not there yet.

    • TheUniverseandNetworks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      generate electricity.

      not generate electricity.

      generate electricity the other way around.

      not generate electricity.

      generate electricity.

      not generate electricity.

      generate electricity the other way around.

      not generate electricity…

      Edit: I dumbly misread your post (energy/electricity) & thought of this, which I will leave here because it made me smile & that’s a good thing.

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    /uj Steam is just an intermediary form for almost all these tho (except maybe geothermal? not sure), not the real source.

    • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      1 year ago

      Steam just makes sense as a fluid for heat engines, thermal power plants are mostly steam, except when gas turbines are involved, but even then there’s most of the time steam bottoming cycle. (gas turbine burns something, then exhaust is hot enough to power steam cycle) Unless thermal power plant is small, then it’s more likely to be diesel engine (up to few MW). Only when it’s photovoltaics, or hydropower, or wind farm (or tidal powerplant, or some other weird ones) there’s no place for steam to be involved (solar thermal plants sometimes use steam cycle). Geothermal powerplants use steam if source is hot enough, otherwise it’s something more volatile in organic Rankine cycle

        • skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Then it’s just heat transfer medium for most of geothermal powerplants too, because from what i understand, most of the time condensed water is recycled (and source of energy is just “hot rocks” anyway)

          then if you look at the bigger picture, all that energy can be traced back to either sun, nuclear fission (in reactors) or nuclear decay/primordial heat (geothermal)

      • zout@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        True, but there are also solar steam systems, using a parabolic mirror to focus the sun on a steam drum.

        • Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Arguably these are even greener than photovoltaics, since they don’t require the same kinds of materials to make (mostly just steel) and last longer than photovoltaics are supposed to. They use a fair bit of water, but you probably aren’t building them in places where water is at a premium.

          • Strykker@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean the main steam cycle solar plants are built in dry sunny hot regions, not exactly a great source of water, but probably not completely void of it either.

  • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.netBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I like piezoelectrics and kinetic generators. The only two methods of generating electricity I know of that don’t involve steam other than solar panels.

    At least, I think they’re different… Is a standard copper wire+magnet generator pizeoelectric? Or is it simply the operation is similar in that you generate electricity from moving things together? Like the difference between tiny little things in your shirt that generate electricity as you move around vs those flash lights you shake to charge.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Piezoelectric effect is when you vibrate certain crystals and they give off electricity. It’s also reversible. You can feed them electricity to generate sound. The beep-boop sound from small electronic devices is usually from a piezo speaker, because they’re dirt cheap.

      You don’t get significant amounts of power out of it, though.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah it’s quartz lol

        Also photovoltaic is reversible as well! Put light in get current out, put current in, get light out. But the diodes that get good light for the currents we use are shit for generating the current we like from the light we have and vice versa. Also! Most diodes are these types! That’s why we make their casing black, otherwise the light will interfere with computation!

      • 🇰 🌀 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 🇮 🏆@yiffit.netBanned
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah. The one thing I ever saw that has me excited for a product that could exist, is that they can power a simple OLED display. And since an OLED display can be paper thin, they could put one in a t-shirt and you could have an animated design on your shirt instead of just a static picture. And that would be dope.

        Of course, you’d need more than just the display, and i don’t think the little generators that can be sewn into a shirt would be enough to power the computing device that would be necessary to drive the animation for the display.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re different. The piezoelectric effect converts pressure to charge. However steam is just kinetic with an extra step

  • FreshLight@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    It always produces unbelievably great memes when another person discovers how humanity generates energy from splitting atoms. I was baffled, too.

    • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      It just makes sense. Our only way to convert electromagnetic radiation to current is photovoltaics, so solar. No way to convert alpha/beta radiation to current. So what else does fission release? Fuckload of motion. Mostly heat if it’s not as a blast, in which case it’s still mostly heat but with a pressure wave that levels cities. Heat though, heat were real good at making into electricity.