Looks expensive. The grey ones are the broken ones.

    • CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are good applications for PV, but it is not reliable thermal power, so it will never sufficiently dispace fossil fuels. We need nuclear, concentrated solar, and/or deep-well geothermal power plants in order to accomplish that.

        • isles@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          I think they might be taking issue primarily with the “reliability”, the argument that solar is all well and good, but because generation isn’t uniform, it can’t fully replace fossil fuels. And I can see the argument for using nuclear for base-load and supplement with solar as it’s available to use.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            i know what they’re saying, but they’re objectively wrong. Sure it’s hard, it’s not the most trivial thing to do. Harder than engineering, designing, and building a CCG turbine plant from the ground up? Highly doubt it, probably more expensive though.

            Nuclear base load is an incredibly good strategy though, although nuclear isn’t fossil fuels, so.