qwioeue@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agoArch with XZlemmy.worldimagemessage-square61fedilinkarrow-up1574
arrow-up1574imageArch with XZlemmy.worldqwioeue@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square61fedilink
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up67·edit-28 months agoArch is not vulnerable to this attack vector. Fedora Rawhide, OpenSUSE Tumbleweed and Debian Testing are.
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9·8 months agoNotice normal distros aren’t affected
minus-squarePossibly linux@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·8 months agoDistros that have some sort of testing before hitting users. Arch also had the issue of killing Intel laptop displays not to long ago as well. Maybe using the term “normal distro” is a bit of a stretch but my point is that testing is good.
minus-squareabbotsbury@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 months agoArch has regular mirrors and testing mirrors, most users use the regular ones.
minus-squarelaurelravenlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·8 months agoIn this context, I’m going to assume they mean “non-rolling-release”
minus-squaremexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·8 months agoNon betas/testing probably?
Arch is not vulnerable to this attack vector. Fedora Rawhide, OpenSUSE Tumbleweed and Debian Testing are.
Notice normal distros aren’t affected
tf is a normal distro?
Distros that have some sort of testing before hitting users. Arch also had the issue of killing Intel laptop displays not to long ago as well.
Maybe using the term “normal distro” is a bit of a stretch but my point is that testing is good.
Arch has regular mirrors and testing mirrors, most users use the regular ones.
In this context, I’m going to assume they mean “non-rolling-release”
Non betas/testing probably?
Windows