FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 9 months agoPlease, for the love of God, VOTE!pawb.socialimagemessage-square325fedilinkarrow-up11.01Kcross-posted to: 196
arrow-up11.01KimagePlease, for the love of God, VOTE!pawb.socialFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Political Memes@lemmy.world · 9 months agomessage-square325fedilinkcross-posted to: 196
minus-squarehoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months agoonly a vote for trump helps him win. and voting for biden also guarantees fascism advances.
minus-squareJaysyn@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up6·9 months agoLOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not. You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.
minus-squarelennybird@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-29 months agoYou know what this sort of rhetorical technique they’re using reminds me of? Sovereign citizens lmao.
minus-squarehoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up2·9 months ago You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments. baby, i’m an anarchist.
minus-squarehoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months agononfalsifiability is actually a bad feature in theories.
minus-squarehoosierHillPowderedCheese@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up1·9 months ago LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not. duverger’s “law” has no predictive value at all. it’s post-hoc storytelling. you can’t prove it wrong because it’s a useless tautology.
only a vote for trump helps him win. and voting for biden also guarantees fascism advances.
LOL, if you could prove Duvinger’s Law wrong you’d be famous, but you’re not.
You’re very likely a Trump supporter stirring shit with those facile arguments.
You know what this sort of rhetorical technique they’re using reminds me of? Sovereign citizens lmao.
baby, i’m an anarchist.
nonfalsifiability is actually a bad feature in theories.
duverger’s “law” has no predictive value at all. it’s post-hoc storytelling. you can’t prove it wrong because it’s a useless tautology.