For me, it’s CTE’s. I find it amazing to complete a calculation with clear intermediate steps, and goes a long way towards convincing people to use SQL rather than Excel to perform calculations on large tables of data.

What construct do you like using on a daily basis?

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Only thing cooler than CTEs are Recursive CTEs, but I struggle to find use cases where I can sneak one in.

    • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe recursive CTEs are pretty cool for tree traversal. Anytime you’ve got a table with a foreign key on its own primary key they might come in handy.

  • Leo Uino@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, CTEs are awesome. Especially when you don’t force materialization and the optimizer can work its magic.

    I’ve had a lot of fun with window functions as well.

  • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    CTEs are so helpful for me. They make complex queries much easier to construct and lets me ‘unit test’ the parts I’m working on.

  • szeis4cookie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was skeptical of CTEs for a long time. I just used subqueries when I could in T SQL, and then I got a new job and my new company used Postgres. In the adaptation process I took a new look at CTEs and became a convert - it’s just nicer and easier to read the intermediate step than as a subquery

    • megaman1970@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Those work, but require a lot of careful structuring to get right, and can be a pain to debug. With a CTE, you can just call on the intermediate steps to trace down problems.

  • itty53@vlemmy.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    You can create a functional enum view by just assigning enums as the column names and storing a single row of the int (or whatever enum) representation.

    Then use that view in a cross join. You can (almost) eliminate magic numbers entirely and makes the code much more human legible.

    Example

    CREATE VIEW AS enum.OrderType
    SELECT 
    CAST (1 as 'New'),
    CAST (2 as 'Pending'),
    CAST (3 as 'Shipped')
    GO
    
    -- Assuming a table with OrderId and OrderTypeId
    
    SELECT              o.OrderId 
    FROM                dbo.Orders AS o
    CROSS JOIN          enum.OrderType AS ot
    WHERE               o.OrderTypeId = ot.[Pending]
    
    -- Only returns orders where TypeId = 2, no need to know what Id that is or for anyone else to in the future either.
    

    This trick works even on large datasets with a lot of complex joins. Getting the status name itself to return is a bit more of a chore though.

    • megaman1970@beehaw.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Hey, that’s pretty neat. Perhaps you could wrap a the OrderType view in a CTE and join on that to get the values back?

  • DarkAngelofMusic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    CTEs can be useful, particularly in PostgreSQL, where there are writable CTEs, but a lot of the time, I prefer using temp tables over CTEs, as they often perform better for larger datasets. I think one of my favorite constructs is window functions. I’ve found many uses for them, over the years.