• Sybil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        another appeal to ridicule? can’t you just accept that it takes two to tango, and you are actively making this place worse?

        • lennybird@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          No seriously, are you okay? It does not, in fact, take two, lest you seek one person to run their mouths and the other to just take it. So unless you’re suggesting we enable bullying without pushing the bully back or fallacies without objection, I’m not really sure what the point is that you’re making.

          So kindly explain your thought-process when you respond with simply re-quoting what I said and nothing more; for overall I think my comments remained largely neutral, barring the low-hanging fruit you identified and which I even acknowledged.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            , I’m not really sure what the point is that you’re making.

            i’m saying don’t use dishonest rhetoric

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I’m fine with that; just make sure you go to the other user in the thread and say the same thing.

              Did you do that?

              Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”?

              Curiously you did not.

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                Did you do that?

                Did you tell them as well that, “it takes two to tango”?

                Curiously you did not.

                i asked you to be the bigger person.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    you’ll forgive me if this reads as though you are not only acting in bad faith, but know you are, and plan to continue.

                • lennybird@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  Who’s engaging dishonestly? Citation needed. That has yet to be substantively evinced.

                  • Sybil@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    you admitted that you were using fallacious rhetoric already (thouh your admission is not necessary: it was prima facie). but you also (correctly) pointed out a strawman, which is also fallacious rhetoric.

          • Sybil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            kindly explain your thought-process when you respond with simply re-quoting what I said

            i was pointing out the hypocrisy

            • lennybird@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              What’s hypocritical about noting, “these, ‘Got it. You just don’t x.’ responses are tiresome”? Do you not recognize the obvious snarkiness and straw-man fallacy? Are you saying I’m not allowed to call this out?

              And why are you replying multiple times to the same comment instead of just consolidating your response into one?

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                why are you replying multiple times to the same comment instead of just consolidating your response into one?

                i don’t like to have multiple ideas in one comment, and i have found it’s an excellent tactic for breaking up a gish gallop. you can read more here:

                https://lemmy.world/post/10922324

              • Sybil@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                8 months ago

                What’s hypocritical about noting, “these, ‘Got it. You just don’t x.’ responses are tiresome”? Do you not recognize the obvious snarkiness and straw-man fallacy? Are you saying I’m not allowed to call this out?

                i’m saying you are doing teh same thing, and you’re right that they are exhausting, so you should also knock it off.