• @Mint@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        383 months ago

        You have a bar: Nazi comes into your bar, you let him stay, because why not its just a single nazi. Nazi invites friends, those friends invite their friends, and so on. Now you a have nazi bar.

      • FfaerieOxide
        link
        fedilink
        273 months ago

        excuse me but what the fuck is the nazi bat problem

        When you find a nazi but you can’t find a bat.

    • @octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      193 months ago

      I remain convinced he’s killing it on purpose. I don’t know a plausible motive, but I guarantee it’s on purpose.

      • kubica
        link
        fedilink
        203 months ago

        I used to think so too, but I don’t know if he is also bad at that because it is taking him longer than I expected.

      • @A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        173 months ago

        If he wanted to kill it on purpose, he could have just shut it down. Maybe to keep the trademark he could have launched some other telecommunications service and used the brand for that.

        Elon Musk is all about convincing people to act against their best interests to benefit him. For example, look at Tesla: it has a manufacturing capacity of ~2 million cars per year. Now look at Toyota: it has a manufacturing capacity of ~9 million vehicles per year. Now look at the market capitalisation of each company: for Tesla it is still about $535B, despite some fall from the peak in 2022. For Toyota, it is $416B (which is a record high).

        So Toyota makes almost 5 times as many cars a year, but is worth 78% of Tesla? And the production capacity and value gap was even more extreme in the past? I think the question then is, what is going on?

        The answer, of course, is Musk. He is very slick at convincing investors to act against their own best interests (usually by suggesting the possibility of things that happen to have the true objective along the way, like full self-driving cars by 2018 rather than competing with existing auto-makers, or 35 minute travel from San Francisco to Los Angeles, or a colony on mars rather than competing with existing satellite companies). This is the same skill-set as a confidence artist. I don’t mean to imply that Musk has necessarily done anything illegal, but due to the similarity in skill set, and the large scale at which he operates, it would be fair to call him the most successful con artist in history. Looking at it through this lens can help to identify his motive.

        So what would a con artist want with a social network, and why would he want to alienate a whole lot of people, and get a lot of haters?

        Well, the truth is that a con artist doesn’t need everyone to believe in them to make money - they just need the marks to believe in them. Con artists don’t want the people who see through the con (call them the haters for lack of a better word) to interfere with their marks though. At the small scale - e.g. a street con, the con artist might separate a couple where one partner is the mark, to prevent the other from alerting their partner to the scam. But in addition to separating the marks from the haters, con artists use brainwashing techniques to create a psychological barrier between the marks and the haters. A Nigerian Prince scammer might try to convince a mark that their accountant can’t be trusted. A religious cult con might brainwash followers to think their family are different from them, and if they try to provide external perspective, they are acting as the devil. They try to make the marks the in-group, and everyone else, even family and friends, the out-group who doesn’t care about the in-group.

        So what would a con artist in control of a social network do? They would start by giving the con artist the megaphone - amplifying everything the artist says to try to get more marks. In parallel, they’d try to get rid of the haters. They could shadow-ban them so the marks never see what they have to say, or they could put up small barriers the marks will happily jump over, and feel more invested in the platform having done that, but which would scare off the haters. However, the marks and the haters might still interact off the social network - so the scam artist would also want to create a culture war to try to make the marks hate the haters, and ignore anything they say, by amplifying messages hostile to the haters.

        So what can you do if you don’t want a world wrecked by divisions sewn just so billionaires can be even richer? My suggestion is don’t buy into the divisions - work to find common ground with people, even if others are saying just to ignore them because they are different and will never get it, and get in early before the divisions are too deep.

      • @DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        I agree he’s killing it on purpose. Something to do with information control.

        His meeting so long at the Superbowl with Rupert Murdoch in his suite sure didn’t give me a warm fuzzy feeling.

    • Scrubbles
      link
      fedilink
      English
      113 months ago

      When the only people I saw there were the leftest lefties I ever saw… then he just alienated all of them

  • Grant_M
    link
    fedilink
    English
    363 months ago

    With so many options becoming available, increasingly less people will select the platform preferred by Nazis.

  • Jaysyn
    link
    fedilink
    283 months ago

    Twitter is for fascists & their sympathizers.

  • @fubarx@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    213 months ago

    My wife insists she’s staying there for the news and legal people she follows and she has a point. A lot of government, business, and schools continue to use it as an easy way to broadcast information.

    Threads pulled off some celebrities, Bsky some policy and legal wonks, and Mastodon the tech geeks. If these services all start federating together and offering unified text and hashtag search, then where you land won’t matter.

    Until then, it’ll be hard to get people to switch away, even with all the bad press.

    • FfaerieOxide
      link
      fedilink
      303 months ago

      If these services all start federating together

      No one should federate with meta.

    • @breden@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      Is it really a racket though? Most artists are not tech geeks and desire cultivated feeds instead of … none.

  • SolNine
    link
    fedilink
    143 months ago

    I never liked Twitter to begin with, once it became an unabashed environment for hate it was a piece of cake to close my account.

  • Storksforlegs
    link
    fedilink
    English
    133 months ago

    At least thats kind of reassuring in a way, that part of it is people dont want to associate with that stuff. (Though I realize that isnt the only reason)

  • Tarte
    link
    fedilink
    12
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    He drove me back into using RSS after more than a decade for staying up to date. Much better for the mental health. Thankfully, since Wordpress and also some other CMS have the RSS feature enabled by default, many websites have it even if they’re not advertising it.

  • @ulkesh@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    123 months ago

    Yes, this is what happens when you take a big shit in people’s cereal. They tend to leave. I, too, could be an analyst.

    • @Zworf@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      Yeah telling your advertising megacustomers to go F… themselves on TV and naming them explicitly. Wow. That’s some kind of nasty.

      It totally proved Disney right, too.

  • @Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    103 months ago

    I only follow specific youtubers and artists. If stray away from my specific feed, Twitter is too scary lol. I am at a loss for good social media though. It seems like most social media sites have just gotten worse over the past decade.

    I guess there’s pros an cons to it all. Pro: less time wasted on social media Con: I’ve missed out on some information that is sometimes good to know.

  • @ULS@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    103 months ago

    It’s morbid but the only use it has to me is info on live shitty events.

    • HeartyBeast
      link
      fedilink
      73 months ago

      When the “large” voices leave in significant numbers - in the UK it is used wildly by public sector and charity organisations, there are official governmental Twitter accounts, all the broadcasters have accounts.

      • @Midnitte@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        73 months ago

        Really wish I could convince local government entities to switch to Mastodon - my local police said it was “subject to O.P.R.A.” and needed to meet retention rules (if you rolled your own…), and the state wildfire commission said they were looking at Threads :/

        So instead, both are still stuck on the platform that requires a login to see posts and filled with nazis.

        • HeartyBeast
          link
          fedilink
          53 months ago

          I think Threads federation may actually help with. I’m trying to persuade a health body at the moment to switch from Twitter and to roll their own Mastodon instance, based on the fact that what they really want is the widget on the website, control of their data and the ability to reach people.

          Twitter has already screwed the widget with the login/authentication requirements. If
          Threads actually allows its users to see Mastodon posts, that’s a big old reachable audience.

    • Uranium3006
      link
      fedilink
      63 months ago

      the death spiral is in progress, elon’s just rich so he can pay bills (or let leases go resulting in eviction…) for a while

    • FfaerieOxide
      link
      fedilink
      33 months ago

      So at what point does/did it reach death spiral?

      It isn’t so much a spiral as it is a series of 90 degree turns.