• pivot_root@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    71
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s good to hear that there’s some more scientific studies showing that gender and sex are distinct facets of our biology. Sadly, I’m skeptical it will do much to sway the bigots, but any good news is positive news!

    • cannibalkitteh
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      2 months ago

      I always get a little antsy around this kind of stuff because eventually, it’s going to get to a point where it either gets treated as a diagnostic tool or insurance requirement for trans people accessing healthcare.

      • Sasha
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        2 months ago

        All my homies hate trans-medicalism, this will inevitably lead to a “cure” or something bullshit like that, we don’t need medical validation in the first place

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 months ago

          Maybe we should try to “cure” all of it. If there was a pill that would “cure” my cisgenderness and make me trans, maybe it would be worth a try. Maybe I’d be happier as a woman even if I didn’t identify as one before.

          Sexual preference too. Maybe I’d be happier being gay. If I could “cure” my heterosexuality, maybe my life would be more fulfilling.

          It would be worth a try anyway.

          Bring on the pills! Better living through chemistry!

          (Obviously I’m being flippant. Any sort of “cure” would be designed to only go one way and we all know which way.)

        • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          Agreed!! Biological determinism is eugenics. And it’s not true, with neuroplasticity we can change. Also, there are multigender and agender people

      • pivot_root@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        As long as it isn’t a requirement for legal or medical procedures and is only used as a diagnostic tool to better understand oneself, it shouldn’t be too problematic, I think. If it’s used to diagnose someone without their consent is a different story, and I would hate to see medical science advancements used to perpetuate abuse rather than improve our lives.

        Or insurance requirement for trans people accessing healthcare.

        I’m hoping private healthcare and health insurance will be a thing of the past by the time your concerns become a reality, but that’s an extremely valid concern nonetheless.

      • LustyArgonianMana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Agreed, also, focusing on the differences becomes divisive at some point. The truth is, women and men think extremely similarly, as we are all human and humans think alike. But we ignore the greater similarities to instead push for tiny divisions. While it’s great to provide validation, neuroplasticity means that a “girl” brain can become a “boy” brain and vice versa through someone’s lifetime. Gender is also not a strict binary anyway, so how it’s determined who’s a girl and who is a boy and who’s agender or multigender - like it’s so much more complicated than a study like this.

    • Tiefling IRL
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      We’ve known for a while that the brains of trans women more closely resemble those of cis women than cis men, and vice versa. Bigots don’t give a shit about the science, they just use their 4th grade understanding of it to attack “others”.

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        2 months ago

        They give a shit about the “science” they think supports their point. Even if it’s something like phrenology.