• HopeOfTheGunblade
      link
      fedilink
      981 month ago

      Yes but see, if we just sit on our hands and don’t vote we won’t have any responsibility for what follows! Only voting for someone who is less than ideal on this issue is a morally bad choice!

      • @StupidBrotherInLaw@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        54
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I totally understand the point most of them are trying to make and agree with the sentiment, but they’re fucking morons. 100% absolute jibbering idiots.

        This is an ugly binary choice here because the United States electoral system is a steaming pile of horse shit. Do what I, your friendly neighborhood lefty, am doing and swallow your pride and vote for center right Joe Biden because he’s leagues better than the dementia-addled, fascist Cheeto Benito. Then take all the disgust you’ve built up by voting for and living with another neoliberal corporate shill presidency and work your ass off to make sure we don’t have to keep voting between Dumb and Dumber every fucking election.

        Do it because we’ll only be gently tiptoeing to the right under a Biden presidency, so it’s less likely you’ll end up in jail for discussing the “wrong” political ideology while that orange shitstained merkin would have me in jail just for writing this were it up to him. Don’t make it up to him.

        • @kescusay@lemmy.worldM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 month ago

          Every time I encounter the “don’t vote” brigade, my first thought is that it’s a Russian or Chinese troll trying to get Trump elected again.

          My second thought, which is a bit more nuanced, is some introspection on what Biden is actually doing. He has three options with regards to Israel, none of them good.

          1. He could deny them weapons, which would inevitably lead to outright war with Iran and an increase in Russian influence in the region, as well as a loss of an ally.
          2. He could fully commit to Netanyahu’s madness (i.e., what Trump wants to do), fully empowering genocide while using no political leverage on Israel. This would also ultimately lead to broad regional warfare, which will also likely increase Russian influence in the region.
          3. He could try to limit the damage by imposing conditions on weapons sales and attempt to thread the needle, recognizing Hamas for the grotesque terrorist organization it is while using political pressure to prevent as much needless death of civilians as possible. This is what Biden is trying to do.

          I don’t know that Biden is doing a very good job with #3, but #1 would be a catastrophe, and #2 is what Trump wants.

          This is a shitty situation in every conceivable way. Our ally, Israel, is currently being run by a corrupt and genocidal freak. There are no good answers to a situation like that beyond Israel coming to its senses and throwing Netanyahu in prison. But there are plenty of really bad answers, and Trump would be the worst.

      • FlashMobOfOne
        link
        fedilink
        English
        4
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        You do realize that “less than ideal” is probably an inadequate way to describe Joe funding a genocidal apartheid, right?

        It’s astonishing to me how comfortable you are with fascism, provided it wears a blue jersey.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          Yes. Humans are given to certainty and judgement in excess of what the evidence merits, so I have taken to understatement.

          I’m not convinced that Joe Biden is fascism, though. Would you be so kind as to compare him to Umberto eco’s list, and share examples on each point? Trump seems like a much better match to that, but perhaps I have missed something.

        • HopeOfTheGunblade
          link
          fedilink
          21 month ago

          I don’t think I said that. Can you show me where I did?

          I will say that you have a slice of responsibility over the future, and you’ll have to live with the consequences of whatever decision you end up making - including the one where you sit on your hands. No matter what you do, you can still complain about it, but the future will be whichever one we collectively steer to. One of those possible futures is worse than the other. So it seems to me that we should steer away from it, rather than wrong our hands about how we don’t like the choices. Sure, you don’t like the choices. They’re the choices regardless. Model the outcomes of each possibility, decide which one you hate the least and steer towards it, because we are getting a future selected from among the possibilities. Jesus is not going to rapture us out of this.

            • HopeOfTheGunblade
              link
              fedilink
              11 month ago

              Yeah, I’ve been having this argument a lot lately, so the sarcasm shit right past me. It’s exhausting trying to get people to understand that no, really, genocide a * 3 plus additional genocide b is worse than genocide a alone.

    • @eestileib@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      631 month ago

      I’m gonna vote for Biden if I have to rise from the dead and crawl through broken glass to do so, and I hope everyone reading this thread does.

      I’m not willing to pretend he’s not facilitating an ongoing genocide though.

          • VaultBoyNewVegas
            link
            fedilink
            English
            71 month ago

            Not really. I’m in Northern Ireland and my vote does fuck all to affect who’s elected UK Prime Minister. The current governing party runs candidates here but they’ve never won a seat and their closest competitors don’t run any candidates at all here. Never mind I live in a stronghold seat so it won’t change anyway.

        • @eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          The Democratic party expects their members to pretend that what’s happening in Gaza is not a genocide. They censured Rep Tlaib for saying so in Congress.

            • FlashMobOfOne
              link
              fedilink
              English
              81 month ago

              So what you’re saying is that you’re a-okay with fascism and genocide, provided it wears a blue jersey?

                • FlashMobOfOne
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  31 month ago

                  I see a whole lot of excuses flying form Democrats to try and distract from the fact that they’re voting for Genocide Joe in November.

                  This thread is littered with them.

                  • @Honytawk@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    81 month ago

                    If you actually cared about saving Palestine, your best bet is genocide Joe whether you like it or not.

                    Every other option just increases the chance for Turbo Genocide Donny to “finish the job”, and you know it.

                    But you don’t care about Palestine, do you? You just want to sow chaos in the US.

                  • @Mastengwe@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    11 month ago

                    If you’re wonder why it seems like no one takes you seriously, it’s the “gEnoCiDe jOe” thing. It’s just as cringy as “Let’S gO bRaNdOn! but with the added take that it’s coming for a group of people that should know better.

      • @DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        31 month ago

        Oh, he’s just following orders!

        It’s not like we have other laws requiring you not to support genocide for this exact situation that he can use to halt arms shipments.

      • @XeroxCool@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        21 month ago

        What is that law? Closest I think I can get is HR 4986 sec 227 which mentions Israel, but I can’t read further. Who put it in place?

        • @davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          161 month ago

          From the linked politico article,

          Legally, the U.S. can’t cut Israel off completely. Since 2008, the U.S. has had to weigh all arms sales to Israel and other countries in the region against the requirement that Israel maintains a “qualitative military edge” against all enemies, both state and non-state actors.

          In 2008, George W. Bush was in his second term as president.

          • @XeroxCool@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            31 month ago

            Yes, Bush was the president for most of 2008. Obama got a short portion, although the exact president in place doesn’t necessarily tell you if they agreed anyway. Since president’s don’t really write law, I was looking for the exact law to see the history of which representatives were pushing it. I wanted to see what the angle was for that piece of the bill and what else was attached to it. Nothing gets passed as an individual law, meaning it was probably a rider in a much larger group of laws that likely made it a non-negotiable requirement bundled into a more pressing matter.

            But I guess 9+ people read my simple question as total contempt for the situation.

      • @JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        471 month ago

        Propagandists are so funny. It’s like…. You make shit up that can’t be proven, verified, or is otherwise even remotely realistic, and then you pretend it’s real to the point that you’re willing to argue it online with total strangers.

        It’s blows my mind how this is done.

          • @JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            241 month ago

            I never said he was a great candidate. I simply said that propagandists seem to have it out for Biden.

            Surprising they’re always silent with their criticism of anything from the right.

            Ever wonder why?

              • @davidagain@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                31 month ago

                But you really don’t know that there are no non choir members reading. I think the proportion of right wingers on the fediverse has shot up in the last year.

                • @mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  21 month ago

                  No, I don’t. But we don’t have proof either way. Conservatives usually get a type of sickness if everyone around them does not think the same way.

                  Hopefully, Halely self reflects and figures out why she is a running [get it] joke. But let’s be real, she’ll probably never change.

      • @treadful@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        421 month ago

        K

        Talking to reporters, Haley was unapologetic, criticising Joe Biden’s administration for temporarily withholding weapons as a means of discouraging an Israeli attack on the southern Gaza city of Rafah, and aiming barbs at the international criminal court (ICC) – which is seeking Netanyahu’s arrest – and the international court of justice (ICJ), which is considering charges of genocide against Israel.

        “What America needs to understand is if Israel’s fighting our enemies, how can we not help them,” said Haley, whose missile message also carried the words “America loves Israel”.

        “The sure way to not help Israel is to withhold weapons. The sure way to not help Israel is to praise the ICC, the ICJ or any of those that are condemning Israel instead of condemning what happens.

        “America needs to do whatever Israel needs and stop telling them how to fight this war. You are either a friend or not a friend.”

        • @Bananigans@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          181 month ago

          “America needs to do whatever Israel needs and stop telling them how to fight this war. You are either a friend or not a friend.”

          She reminds me of an alcoholic friend I had in college. Telling you to stop doesn’t mean I hate you. It means you’re making bad decisions.

      • @aleph@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        34
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        I’m not defending Biden, but the view that Trump would be any less prepared to keep sending Israel weapons is utterly baseless. He wouldn’t even pretend to care about the Palestinians, for one thing.

      • @No_Change_Just_Money@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        261 month ago

        Ok, but Trump literally said he deports anybody who protests Israel

        How is this better than Joe, who says that Isreal will lose us support if they don’t stop and prioritize civilian safety in their attacks?

      • @brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        151 month ago

        Joe Biden is a lot more efficient at getting weapons Israel needs for their genocide than Trump ever will be.

        Anybody out there who can vet this? Cuz if I wanted a twice-impeached president victory I think I would post:

        45 is a lot more efficient at getting weapons Israel needs for their genocide than Biden ever will be.

        • @rayyy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          91 month ago

          Joe Biden is a lot more efficient at getting weapons Israel needs for their genocide than Trump ever will be

          ^^ That is a heaping pile of BULLSHIT.

        • AWildMimicAppears
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 month ago

          the point is not to make more people vote trump (everyone who is morally bankrupt enough will do that anyway)

          the point is FUD, so that biden voters stay home (good for trump) or vote 3rd party (which would be valid if it weren’t a first past the post system)

          • @Jentu
            link
            English
            11 month ago

            The point might actually be to sink Biden’s approval rating so low that he’s forced to reverse course on the specific thing making him unpopular and less likely to win.

        • @JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          Russia only cares about two of them. One of them is reliant on a Trump victory, and the other is to ensure it happens.

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod
      link
      fedilink
      English
      61 month ago

      Yeah, those stupid kids should just realize that one constant in America is that we kill or enable the killing of children. They should just accept that children will be killed in their name and get over themselves like us grown ups.

    • FlashMobOfOne
      link
      fedilink
      English
      41 month ago

      No, it isn’t.

      We want to replace Genocide Joe with the Greens.

      Unfortunately most American voters lack a conscience, so it’s not going to happen.

      • TheLowestStone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        101 month ago

        Unfortunately most American voters lack a conscience, so it’s not going to happen.

        If you actually want to attract people to your cause, you may want to consider changing your tone. It could also be beneficial to mention some positive things about the candidate that you recommend instead of just bashing the current regime.

        • FlashMobOfOne
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 month ago

          I’m shouting into the void and I know it. Nothing I do or say will change anything.

          I can look at the last 40 years and be astonished at how little American voters care about their own welfare, and rest assured that the election in November will likely be 49% to 49%, because for some reason they all are just exceptionally well-programmed to vote for the candidates that the wealthy want them to vote for. All of them are poorer now, both economically and socially, than they were even just ten years ago. They can see with their own two eyes that they get poorer no matter which party we elect, and it doesn’t stop them from voting solely on team color anyway.

          Hell, the Democrats had Marianne Williamson, an anti-war, pro-living wage, pro-universal health care candidate who can actually form a coherent thought in their primary. They decided overwhelmingly that they wanted the old, addled warmonger to be their president, even though he’s done nothing meaningful to try and fix their poverty, opting to spend his time keeping his scumbag son out of prison and the war money flowing to other countries.

          • @explodicle@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            61 month ago

            Then your desire to shout about your bigger-than-average conscience is at odds with your desire to replace the Democrats with the Greens. You do make a difference.

          • TheLowestStone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            21 month ago

            Oh no, you’re making a difference for sure. You’re absolutely pushing people AWAY from the green party.

      • YeetPics
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        Lmao, comment more.

        You’re definitely not making yourself look like you need live-in nursing care to wipe your ass.

        You’re also making really REALLY good, logical fair points and you’re totally not moving the goalposts.

        Take your bad faith ba to .ml or hexbear, you troglodyte.

    • YeetPics
      link
      fedilink
      English
      31 month ago

      Tankies don’t show up to forums about headlines they can’t cram into their preordained propaganda forms.