• @pastabatman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    262 months ago

    I honestly never even considered that it was a slur. Sometimes you are having a discussion where gender identity is relevant, and in that situation it is useful to be able to clearly indicate that someone is cisgender.

    See I just used it.

    • @mightyfoolish@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      23
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      The word was created so the official opposite of transgender is not simply the word “normal”. Treating cisgender as a slur is just attacking transgender people.

      • @Beetlejuice001@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        22 months ago

        I agree completely. The whole manufactured discussion about it it ridiculous. Conservative love to be able to point at social values and try to claim there is simply an opposite alternative fact that’s completely contradictory to it on the conservative spectrum. Did you notice when they normalized leftist?

    • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      42 months ago

      When I first heard it, I assumed it was a slur because the closest common use English word is cissy.

      But then I like… looked it up.

      Basically, I can understand how some folks initially think it’s a slur, but this conservative overreaction is clearly in bad faith and it’d almost certainly happen whatever the fuck the word was.