Two years ago, sodium-ion battery pioneer Natron Energy was busy preparing its specially formulated sodium batteries for mass production. The company slipped a little past its 2023 kickoff plans, but it didn't fall too far behind as far as mass battery production goes. It officially commenced…
  • GormadtEnglish
    36•16 days ago

    I love nuclear but this new battery tech has me super excited

    It increases the viability of renewable energy sources (especially solar) which makes me hella happy

      • capitalEnglish
        28•16 days ago

        Not who you asked but look at France’s energy mix compared to the US.

        Imagine where the US could be today regarding emissions if we had kept up with nuclear this whole time.

          • @Sl00k@programming.devEnglish
            3•15 days ago

            Perhaps a bad example because most people undermine them, but China has still decided to move forward with 4 different nuclear facilities this year despite having an ABUNDANCE of solar manufacturing. If they found that decision worthwhile I would think the opposite, assuming most of the reasoning is current battery tech can’t sustain dark periods at a massive scale, but I’m not an expert.

            Also just saw you mentioned nuclear costs in another comment, I suggest you look at South Korea and China’s cost per facility compared to the US, they’re able to build and maintain facilities at about half the US does.

            • @IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
              2•15 days ago

              Literally every source I’ve come across has nuclear being massively more expensive than renewables + storage, at least in the West.

              The market decides what to invest in in a capitalist economy and they will tend to go for the thing that makes them the most money in the shortest time possible and that’s why new nuclear isn’t happening much.

              If you’re advocating for public ownership of utilities so there’s central planning and long term thinking instead of profit chasing, that’s an interesting debate to have.

        • GormadtEnglish
          16•14 days ago

          This is exactly why I love nuclear

          And who can forget the classic, “Where is the waste from fossil fuels? Take a deep breath, it’s in your lungs. Where is the waste from nuclear power? Where we store it.”

          Yes there have been disasters but the waste from those are tracked, in a specific location, and can be cleaned up. The default state of fossil fuels hits every living breathing thing on Earth.

          And even factoring in the impact from disasters nuclear is still the safest. And we have even safer designs for reactors nowadays then the reactors that had those disasters.

          • @skulblaka@startrek.websiteEnglish
            14•16 days ago

            Nuclear suffers from the airplane fallacy where when something goes wrong it tends to go really wrong and a lot of people die at once and it makes the news. But fact is, many orders of magnitude more people have died from fossil fuel plants, mining, byproducts, and combustion. They just die slower, in smaller groups, so it doesn’t get reported on as easily.

          • @unphazed@lemmy.worldEnglish
            2•16 days ago

            And now we’re in an age of nuclear fusion. My kid or grandkids may live in a world powered by even cleaner reactors. Which is great because they will probably have to live entirely indoors.

            • @sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
              4•16 days ago

              Eh, I feel like we’ve been in an age of nuclear fusion for decades, it’s always just around the corner…

              But maybe this latest set of breakthroughs will be it. I’ll believe it when I see a production scale plant.

              • @IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.worldEnglish
                4•15 days ago

                It has value in terms of research but I’ve seen no evidence that we’re even remotely close to hooking a fusion reactor up to a grid.