That one is true, though. It’s like when we learned squirrels violate all known laws of physics and are actually part of an elaborate conspiracy to collect acorns and corner the market on oak saplings.
Blather is defined as talk long-windedly without making very much sense. Not making very much sense to me is incoherence. Your logic knife is so sharp your cutting yourself.
In a major development, according to reports emerging online
and
According to reports from sources that produce news on such matters
These just scream AI-written to me. Especially the second one. Nobody talks or writes like that. If you don’t have sources to mention, you don’t mention sources.
What an incoherent mess of an article.
Probably AI written
“According to reports from sources that produce news on such matters, this is critical,…”
That was incoherent for me.
Birds aren’t real according to sources that make claims that birds aren’t real.
That one is true, though. It’s like when we learned squirrels violate all known laws of physics and are actually part of an elaborate conspiracy to collect acorns and corner the market on oak saplings.
Typical…
But what percentage of fake birds are real fake birds?
Likewise
Which is part of why I’m thinking it was AI written
It’s perfectly coherent, it’s just blather.
Blather is defined as talk long-windedly without making very much sense. Not making very much sense to me is incoherence. Your logic knife is so sharp your cutting yourself.
I don’t think that’s nonsensical so much as redundantly redundant
and
These just scream AI-written to me. Especially the second one. Nobody talks or writes like that. If you don’t have sources to mention, you don’t mention sources.
Inglish