• @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    52
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    English is gender neutral. You have to deliberately apply a gender to something unless that word is gender specific, like cow or bitch referring to female animals.

    In my brief forays learning other languages one of the more frustrating things to learn is that you can have female refrigerators, male buses, and gender neutral roofs. That is not gender neutrality.

    So I don’t get your issue with genders, seeing as they have nothing to do with English language neutrality and everything to do with how you address a specific individual at their request.

    • Farid
      link
      fedilink
      English
      72 months ago

      In one of the languages I know, there isn’t a different pronoun for each gender; there’s just one pronoun to indicate ‘they’ in the singular form. Maybe that’s what they meant.

    • @no_name_dev_from_hell@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12 months ago

      In Persian we don’t have genders for anything. No words, no pronouns, nothing. So having gendered pronouns for me is not gender neutral. I would rather call everyone equally “they” than get into this game of what are you identifying yourself because it makes the language more complex for me.

      • @RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        12 months ago

        How is it more difficult? If someone’s name is Joe Smith, you would commonly expect to refer to them as Joe. But say they ask you to refer to them as Mr. Smith. Ok, no big deal, right?

        Referring to someone by their preferred pronoun is no different. If Joe wants to be “they”, it’s no big deal.

        The apparent issue is with gender and people’s personal hang ups with it. People change how they address others all the time, formally, informally, professionally, familiar, marriage name change, etc. So all I’m getting here is resistance to what…? LBGTQ people?