• @Zacryon@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    17
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Kilonewton? That would be a force and not a mass. For mass the standard unit is (kilo)grams.

    • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      5
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      But weight is gravitational force not mass. These are deeply related but not the same because us customary is based on pre Newtonian measurement systems

      • Iron Lynx
        link
        fedilink
        English
        134 months ago

        If you say that something “weighs” something, that’s a description of mass, not weight, because the wording is from before a time when it was understood that mass and weight are different things.

        All has been said that needs to be said, bloody pedant.

        • @captainlezbian@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          54 months ago

          I was mostly just joking. Of course we use lbs as pseudomass. Fuck, we’ve moved to lbm vs lbf in America because mechanical engineers must be stopped and metricated by force if necessary. We’re a spacefaring species that’s advanced enough to have planetary gravitational maps, of course mass is what we should be using. But also weight as force is just kinda funny to use outside the myriad times you actually need to in engineering

        • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          14 months ago

          Specifically LBS is a force, though. Imperial Pounds is not a mass measurement, so converting it would be a better equivalent to Kilonewtons.

    • @FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      24 months ago

      LBS is Imperial Pounds which is a measure of Force and not Mass. That is why your LBS fluctuates based on gravity but your mass doesn’t. So they are correct.