@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 5 months agoChina set to lose 60 percent of population by century's endwww.newsweek.comexternal-linkmessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up171cross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
arrow-up171external-linkChina set to lose 60 percent of population by century's endwww.newsweek.com@RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to World News@lemmy.ml • 5 months agomessage-square10fedilinkcross-posted to: world@lemmy.world
minus-square@cmbabul@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink14•edit-25 months agoWe know why, because degrowth means less wealth in the pockets of the owners of news organizations
minus-square@InternetCitizen2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink1•4 months agoIs it bad for me to be apathetic or is there something in it for the commoer? Like I’m ready to shrug and say “personal problem bro” to the wealth reduction of the elite. Wondering what else needs to be considered.
We know why, because degrowth means less wealth in the pockets of the owners of news organizations
Is it bad for me to be apathetic or is there something in it for the commoer?
Like I’m ready to shrug and say “personal problem bro” to the wealth reduction of the elite. Wondering what else needs to be considered.