BarqsHasBite to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-25 months agoThose that watched the Putin interview, is it worth watching?message-square18fedilinkarrow-up136file-text
arrow-up136message-squareThose that watched the Putin interview, is it worth watching?BarqsHasBite to Ask Lemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish • edit-25 months agomessage-square18fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlinkfedilink6•5 months agoI think Putin/Tucker would be a great presidential ticket for the states.
minus-square@RobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilink1•5 months agoHe’d be the only one running capable of having a cognisant conversation for two hours…
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlinkfedilink15•5 months agoI think we have different definitions of cognisant.
minus-square@RobotToaster@mander.xyzlinkfedilink1•5 months ago Aware; fully informed; having understanding of a fact. Sapient; self-aware. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cognizant#English
minus-squareSatansMaggotyCumFartlinkfedilink7•5 months agoBut you’re saying that Trump and Biden don’t fit this definition?
minus-square@corsicanguppy@lemmy.calinkfedilink6•5 months agoYes. It’s called to “both-sides” the argument. And like arguing with a pig, it only possibly benefits one side.
I think Putin/Tucker would be a great presidential ticket for the states.
Pucker
Tuckerin?
Tuckin’
He’d be the only one running capable of having a cognisant conversation for two hours…
I think we have different definitions of cognisant.
https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/cognizant#English
But you’re saying that Trump and Biden don’t fit this definition?
Yes. It’s called to “both-sides” the argument. And like arguing with a pig, it only possibly benefits one side.