Federal labor regulators allege that SpaceX illegally fired employees who publicly criticized Elon Musk, the exploration company’s founder and CEO.

According to allegations laid out in a complaint filed Wednesday by a regional office of the National Labor Relations Board, SpaceX wrongfully terminated eight employees and interrogated dozens more in 2022 after the workers wrote and shared an open letter calling for the company’s leadership to condemn Musk’s “disparaging” and “sexually charged” comments on social media.

The letter criticized SpaceX management for what the authors called the company’s failure to tackle a culture of “sexism, harassment and discrimination” within its workplace, the NLRB said in the complaint. Separately, they asked SpaceX to “condemn” Musk’s “harmful Twitter behavior.”

  • partial_accumen
    link
    fedilink
    24
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    We’re still in the middle of the second act. The third act starts in about 10 to 15 years when the unbridled philanthropy happens attempting to whitewash the actions of the second act in search of redemption.

    • @zbyte64
      link
      English
      96 months ago

      I think Bill Gates might have inoculated the public against such PR.

      • partial_accumen
        link
        fedilink
        246 months ago

        Us old folks have lived through a lifetime with Bill Gates. The PR isn’t for us. Its for the people born after he did all his bad stuff that never experienced it firsthand. They’ll only see the philanthropy.

        Rockefeller, Carnegie, and others did this successfully. When the Today Show comes on the air and the announcer says “Live from Rockefeller center…!” does anyone today think of the carnage John D left in his wake?

        • @zbyte64
          link
          English
          66 months ago

          True. I guess I’m hoping his recent fuck up with keeping the COVID vaccine from being more widely distributed might galvanize the youths. That and the Epstein flight logs.

        • FuglyDuck
          link
          fedilink
          English
          46 months ago

          The philanthropy has nothing to do with PR. It’s tax evasion.

          • partial_accumen
            link
            fedilink
            76 months ago

            Tax avoidance is certainly one factor, but to dismiss old people’s desire for legacy would be dishonest. If it was just for tax reasons, the person’s name wouldn’t be requested to be included in the philanthropic venture.

            Example:

            It could have been called the “New York Cancer Center” but it wasn’t.

            • FuglyDuck
              link
              fedilink
              English
              16 months ago

              That’s as much just ego, honestly.

              Like how Trump needs to put his name on literally every single thing that is his.

              • partial_accumen
                link
                fedilink
                56 months ago

                Ego is to Charmander as Legacy is to Charizard. Legacy is the superpowered version of ego.