Federal labor regulators allege that SpaceX illegally fired employees who publicly criticized Elon Musk, the exploration company’s founder and CEO.

According to allegations laid out in a complaint filed Wednesday by a regional office of the National Labor Relations Board, SpaceX wrongfully terminated eight employees and interrogated dozens more in 2022 after the workers wrote and shared an open letter calling for the company’s leadership to condemn Musk’s “disparaging” and “sexually charged” comments on social media.

The letter criticized SpaceX management for what the authors called the company’s failure to tackle a culture of “sexism, harassment and discrimination” within its workplace, the NLRB said in the complaint. Separately, they asked SpaceX to “condemn” Musk’s “harmful Twitter behavior.”

  • @zbyte64
    link
    English
    96 months ago

    I think Bill Gates might have inoculated the public against such PR.

    • partial_accumen
      link
      fedilink
      246 months ago

      Us old folks have lived through a lifetime with Bill Gates. The PR isn’t for us. Its for the people born after he did all his bad stuff that never experienced it firsthand. They’ll only see the philanthropy.

      Rockefeller, Carnegie, and others did this successfully. When the Today Show comes on the air and the announcer says “Live from Rockefeller center…!” does anyone today think of the carnage John D left in his wake?

      • @zbyte64
        link
        English
        66 months ago

        True. I guess I’m hoping his recent fuck up with keeping the COVID vaccine from being more widely distributed might galvanize the youths. That and the Epstein flight logs.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 months ago

        The philanthropy has nothing to do with PR. It’s tax evasion.

        • partial_accumen
          link
          fedilink
          76 months ago

          Tax avoidance is certainly one factor, but to dismiss old people’s desire for legacy would be dishonest. If it was just for tax reasons, the person’s name wouldn’t be requested to be included in the philanthropic venture.

          Example:

          It could have been called the “New York Cancer Center” but it wasn’t.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            16 months ago

            That’s as much just ego, honestly.

            Like how Trump needs to put his name on literally every single thing that is his.

            • partial_accumen
              link
              fedilink
              56 months ago

              Ego is to Charmander as Legacy is to Charizard. Legacy is the superpowered version of ego.