• @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    56 months ago

    Why would he have a moral obligation to remove himself from the list or pay attention to what subs he was added as mod? I could see complaining that as CEO he didn’t choose to ban the sub sooner, but moderator status seems kind of irrelevant here.

    • mrbubblesort
      link
      fedilink
      136 months ago

      You gotta realize reddit was a lot smaller back then and the admins, including spez, were much more active and engaged on the site. He was very much in on the “joke”

    • @Catoblepas
      link
      116 months ago

      It illustrates how comfortable he was with having a CSAM enthusiast subreddit on a site he owned.

      • @chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        Seems totally plausible and likely that he was added as moderator on a long list of subs and never perused or paid attention to that list, so how would it illustrate that? The infamy of that sub makes a lot more sense as evidence that he must have been aware of it, and that would be a legitimate basis for criticism. The moderator thing is just a memeable detail that is itself true but implies something that seems to be not true: that he had a direct role in operating the sub beyond running Reddit and allowing it to exist. I don’t think there’s a case for it having any significance beyond that false implication.

        • @Catoblepas
          link
          12
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Copying my reply from a different subthread:

          You know they made a custom award for the creator of the jailbait sub called “Pimp Daddy,” right? And that for a long time one of the autosuggested results from Google when you googled reddit was the jailbait sub? Do you think a CEO of a “major company” (not what reddit was at the time, they were still desperately drumming up users) is somehow unaware of what shows up when you google their company?