• @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        227 months ago

        Because their algorithms have a clear negative impact on Europeans mental health and are contributing to the deterioration of democracy? Or because they are thinly veiled front for Chinese intelligence services?

        • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          17 months ago

          Yes, those could be harmful. How does location of the data center change that? If anything, it’s better to have it in EEA for better oversight, no?

          • @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            10
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            The data is already processed in Europe, that doesn’t change. The fact that they are getting marching orders from the CCP also doesn’t. And even if they were Europeans what they are doing should be a crime.

            • @misk@sopuli.xyzOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              27 months ago

              Okay, so no change in terms of legality of the enterprise. Personally I’m in favor of regulating Youtube and Tiktok to the point that they’re truly socially responsible and only slightly profitable but that’s mostly irrelevant to data center location discussion.

              In terms of benefits of investing in data center in Norway I could list:

              • using renewable energy sources in a location that’s very good at those
              • staying at regulators arms length
              • jobs

              So I think this is good news.

              • @jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                English
                97 months ago

                Letting people build a Heroin-Cyanide candy factory would also bring jobs, I still think it should be illegal.

                  • Nyfure
                    link
                    fedilink
                    37 months ago

                    One at a time, but comparing A to B, because B is also doing bad things doesnt negate nor justify the impact of A, which in this case, i’d say is worse.
                    Yes, I believe it is slightly preferable to be under surveillance by an unstable democracy with a history of disregard for other nations laws, than to be monitored by China’s Communist Party, which has previously used such data for oppression and manipulation.

                    Though i agree and would make, if possible, both responsible for their actions and control over others. And here it also seems, there is more control over the big sea than in Asia, making one marginally better than theother.