This Southern California solar farm is using retired EV batteries for storing the power and then send to the grid when needed. This way the retired batteries can extend their usefulness for several…::A Southern California company is showing how repurposing EV batteries for stationary storage can extend their usefulness for several years.

  • @CommanderCloon@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    6
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    Good idea but good luck to the people who will try to take the fire out

    Edit: I’m not saying that it’s bad, of course renewable, solar, electric is good. But knowing how horrible electric vehicle fires are to put out, I don’t see a fire of piled up batteries being an easy challenge for firefighters

    • @KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      178 months ago

      Any energy storage device has risks. In this case the risk is higher, but so is the overall energy storage capability. If you store them off to the side in their own little building, there’s no real risk beyond loss of investment and environmental impacts.

      Not to mention, firefighters now have tools to fight these types of fires.

      • Otter
        link
        fedilink
        English
        158 months ago

        Also since it’s in one place, you can build in detection and fire suppression measures.

        Could be as simple as having the tools nearby (fire hydrant style), or as complex as automating the checks and suppression (cut off power, isolate the problem cells, spray em)

        • @nevemsenki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          48 months ago

          If these batteries are stable (ie only needs maintenance rarely) , is there a reason not to keep them in a closed, CO2 filled enclosure?

          • @LwL@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Lithium batteries can produce oxygen when at high temperature. I’m not sure if they would produce enough to be able to start burning in such conditions, but I wouldn’t rule it out (maybe someone better versed in chemistry knows). And once they start burning, the fire heats them up more, so they produce more oxygen, whch further fuels the fire.

            • @TheOSINTguy@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              1
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              I wouldn’t be as worried about oxygen, but more worried about properly sealing the container off as a water leak could cause the lithium in the battery’s to produce hydrogen.

              But the odds off either happening are very slim.

              Edit: the water has to come in contact with the lithium.

          • Otter
            link
            fedilink
            English
            18 months ago

            That would be cool, maybe cost to keep the CO2 levels maintained and leak proof? I’d be curious to learn more about CO2 filled enclosures. I think some rare books are kept in them?

            Another alternative could be to flood the room with CO2 when an issue is detected. But I guess that’s just fire suppression again

    • @Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      168 months ago

      Batteries and by extension EVs have a much lower risk of catching fire than ICE cars. Stop repeating fossil fuel industry gaslighting.

      • @LwL@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        58 months ago

        Lower risk yes, but also harder to put out yes, and also the comparison here isn’t about cars at all.

        It still shouldn’t be an issue as long as you place the storage somewhere where the fire can be contained easily, then worst case the whole storage burns down but there wouldn’t be significant collateral damage.