• riwo
    link
    668 months ago

    in a lot of places you are legally obligated to tell cops ur name and show them ur passport or drivers license, when they ask. so if this is the case for u, u should do it (and then shut up and say nothing more without ur lawyer)

      • Norah - She/They
        link
        English
        298 months ago

        Hi, did you know that there are a large number of English speakers on the internet for whom quoting an amendment of the US constitution would not be helpful?

          • Norah - She/They
            link
            English
            128 months ago

            Yes, I would be one of them.

            That’s worse mate! You said 5th amendment three bloody times, when you could have given the same advice without referencing it at all. It’s not like saying “5th amendment” is a neck verse or something. You can just say “I’m choosing to invoke my right to not answer questions at this time” and as a bonus, that works everywhere that has such a right, including the United States ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

              • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                38 months ago

                Well… We did kinda occupy The Philippines for about 60-70 years. It makes sense that their legal system might look like ours, kinda like Japan as well. I know we basically set up the modern Japanese government, I wouldn’t be at all surprised to find out we did the same thing in The Philippines.

      • Einar
        link
        fedilink
        188 months ago

        Again, only in the US.

        Nevertheless, the right to remain silent is protected in many countries. Deciding whether to use it on the other hand, is not always easy.

          • @uriel238OP
            link
            48 months ago

            The US Supreme Court has ruled that passwords are protected by the fifth amendment protection against self-incrimination.

            Biometrics are not.

            Law enforcement hacking into your device is acceptable. Evidence on your device remains admissable with probable cause, a warrant or a judge who likes the police / dislikes you.

            Some judges will hold you in contempt for failing unlock your own device. (fourteen years is the record on contempt jail terms). So YMMV once youre facing charges.

            Theres also a forgone conclusion rule. If the prosecutors can show sufficient evidence to a crime exists on your device, you can be compelled to open it. I do not know how this proof happens.

            Also some judges (including SCOTUS by a ruling) just dont care if the evidence of a crime was legally obtained, they let it be admissible because locking you away is more important than state actors following protocols that preserve civil rights. Id est, the whole of the fourth and fifth amendments to the Constitution of the United States are as slippery as Schrödinger’s cat.

    • Null User Object
      link
      fedilink
      148 months ago

      I think you’ll find you’ll start getting taken way more seriously online when you start typing like an adult. Use whole words, not stupid abbreviations. Capitalize and punctuate appropriately.

      • @toadstorm@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        158 months ago

        If you want to be taken seriously online, don’t use stupid colloquialisms like “way more seriously.” Use grammatically correct phrasing like “far more seriously.” Start writing like an adult.

      • riwo
        link
        48 months ago

        didnt ask + go fuck urself + i type however the fuck i want uwu

        i think u might be seen as way less unlikeable if u stopped being such a tight assed bitch <3

        i’m an adult. any way i type is like an adult. if someone cant take me serious because of the way i type, thats their issue. i’m in the comment section of an online meme community not writing a work email. i can write however i want as long as its understandable.

      • riwo
        link
        08 months ago

        deleted by creator

    • @AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      58 months ago

      In the US that is a 4th amendment violation. Some states get around that by requiring convicted felons to provide ID, but in most of the US if you haven’t been convicted of a felony you have no obligation to identify yourself.

      • Cethin
        link
        fedilink
        English
        18 months ago

        Even if you’re right, you have many court battles ahead if you’re in a state that requires it, including likely the SCOTUS. Do you have the money and time to do this? Go for it. Most people don’t. Don’t help them, but also don’t give them a reason to arrest you.