• @jarfil@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    29 months ago

    Standards bodies is where social protocols traditionally go to die (see Jabber/XMPP).

    Fully portable accounts, even fully portable communities, is something possible with Lemmy (not implemented), along with several other interesting possibilities.

    • @maegul@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      19 months ago

      How would fully portable accounts and communities be implemented do you think? My vague understanding is that users, communities and content lives at a particular URL and can’t simply change its domain.

      • @jarfil@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        2
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Right now, there are several elements:

        • Users — Mastodon deals with it by introducing a “Move” action that makes any followers switch from following the old user URL to a new user URL. A server export and import would be required for the user’s subscribed communities, config, and profile data.
        • Comments — This is where things get somewhat hairy, but possible; the new home server (instance) would need to re-publish the user’s content as coming from the new user URL. Ideally there could be a similar “Move” or “Takeover” activity that an instance could broadcast for each content item, so they would get reattached to the new user URL.
        • Interactions — Other user’s responses, boosts, faves, etc. reference old content URLs, so instances should follow the “Move” and “Takeover” events and fix those accordingly.
        • Lemmy Communities/Posts — This one’s actually the easiest: communities are just a special user that boosts any message sent to the community. You can clone a community right now by simply creating a “community user” and having it boost the same messages as the “source” community. Then you can delete the original, or have it de-boost stuff, or keep both boosts, or whatever.

        Extras:

        • Cross-posting — A “community user” boosts a post from another (it’s a pity we don’t have this yet).
        • Splitting a Post — Have the second community user boost a post with just some of the comment threads, while the original de-boosts them. Now there are two posts with maybe comments that maybe follow different instance rules, or fit better with different instance profiles.
        • Post linking to a toot or comment — This would need some format change, but wouldn’t be too difficult.
        • Upgrading a comment to a post — This would require several of the previous features, but would allow moving off-topic conversations to their right place.
      • aard
        link
        fedilink
        19 months ago

        Bluesky already allows you to use your own domain for your handle. Currently they just use a TXT record in DNS to verify it is your domain - but adding another record to specify on which instance this is hosted shouldn’t be too hard.