Pseudo-monopolies are great at extinguishing imagination like that, and tbh Google search (as I understand its basic setup) was only as good as it was thanks to timing and few really good competitors.

  • Rhynoplaz
    link
    fedilink
    549 months ago

    I would argue against this lack of competitors you mentioned. We were using AskJeeves, Webcrawler, yahoo, msn, aol, Alta Vista, Lycos, Excite, Hotbot and a myriad of local service providers’ homepages.

    Google came much later than all of those, but it was better. How? I don’t know, I was just a kid that got better results from Google than any of those other places.

    Just because Google DESTROYED the competition before you got there doesn’t mean that there wasn’t any.

    • Carighan Maconar
      link
      fedilink
      209 months ago

      Exactly. I would say more specifically, Google’s PageRank algorithm for prioritizing results was genius because it excluded the vast oceans of word-spam sites that floated to the top of all the other search engines.

      • Rhynoplaz
        link
        fedilink
        149 months ago

        Yes! Thanks for reminding me. Some pages would just have a dictionary of popular words in their Metadata so if you were searching for N*Sync (shut up, it was the 90s!) you’d have to scroll through a bunch of unrelated garbage before you found anything related to what you wanted.

        • @med@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          4
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          One only has to remember all the ‘keywords’ under a youtube video back in the day, it was a nightmare to whittle things down to what you wanted

          • Rhynoplaz
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            If we’re talking “back in the day” you had to remember WHICH website you found the video on, because everyone self published, or chose one of hundreds of sites to submit their content to.

    • @knotthatone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      69 months ago

      At the time, they gave better results and the clean and simple design got right to it without all of the BANNER! BANNER! HONK!HONK! of the competitors.

      They had ads, but they were just text links that said they were ads and weren’t playing games with rankings based on who bribed them.

    • @evdo
      link
      English
      29 months ago

      Remember when they got rid of Jeeves?

    • ElleOP
      link
      fedilink
      1
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Fwiw I was aware of a number of those, hence why in the OP I mention: “and few really good competitors.” That wasn’t to suggest there were few total competitors, only that there were few really good competitors, which I think is generally the case any time you have a large number of, well, anything tbh.

      May be rather dismissive, but it’s not a new observation by any means.