stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agoUS rejects AI copyright for famous state fair-winning Midjourney artarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square125fedilinkarrow-up1351file-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldglobalnews@lemmy.ziphackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
arrow-up1351external-linkUS rejects AI copyright for famous state fair-winning Midjourney artarstechnica.comstopthatgirl7@kbin.social to Technology@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square125fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: news@lemmy.worldglobalnews@lemmy.ziphackernews@derp.footechnews@radiation.party
minus-squarestevexley@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up12·edit-21 year agoThat’s only with the artist’s agreement though isn’t it? Usually because you’re paying them. In this case the artist isn’t a person so can’t grant you the copyright (I think)
minus-squareSkyeStarfalllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·edit-21 year agoYes, in practice this would be a contract with the artist deciding whether the copyright is transferred or not. Because by default, if you commission someone to draw something for you, they keep the copyright.
minus-squaretreefrog@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoThen it’s public domain according to cases so far.
That’s only with the artist’s agreement though isn’t it? Usually because you’re paying them. In this case the artist isn’t a person so can’t grant you the copyright (I think)
Yes, in practice this would be a contract with the artist deciding whether the copyright is transferred or not.
Because by default, if you commission someone to draw something for you, they keep the copyright.
Removed by mod
Then it’s public domain according to cases so far.