• SkyeStarfall
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s just rotated, right? Since there is no universal up direction in space, you can just rotate your camera to rotate the image

    • DessertStorms@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I suppose you’re right, not sure why I thought it was flipped rather than just rotated. I also assumed for some reason op was a new JWST photo, but both are Hubble.
      So is it just Hubble floating at a different angle resulting in images at different rotations?

      • SkyeStarfall
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well, not a different angle exactly, but spinned a different orientation. It would be… well… rotated.

        Since there is no friction in vacuum, spacecraft usually use reaction wheels to keep their orientation stable relative to a point together with thrusters to release built up angular momentum.

        But basically, in space, it’s very easy to rotate due to no friction, so taking images at different orientations is very easy to do without further corrections. …or one could just digitally rotate stuff. It’s just artistic choice more than anything.

        • DessertStorms@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s just artistic choice more than anything.

          I think this must be it. I guess we’re generally presented with images always facing the same way to help with recognisability of the objects, but someone seems to have made the choice not to this time, for whatever reason. And here I am imagining all sorts of space nonsense, when it’s such a mundane explanation… 😂

          • SkyeStarfall
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah haha, not everything in space has to be complicated!