They’ve grown up online. So why are our kids not better at detecting misinformation?::Recent studies have shown teens are more susceptible than adults. It’s a problem researchers, teachers and parents are only beginning to understand.

    • @amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2310 months ago

      I think that I’m better simply because of my early exposure to the internet (as this article assumes would be true of the next generation). I think the difference is in how the internet is being presented to children now versus a decade ago. Many kids today can hardly install an application to a computer, I believe because they see technology as just a part of life to take or leave, not the “exciting new thing”.

      Why try to use a computer when you can use a chromebook, and now that the internet is so cushy, lets click some links!

      • Blake [he/him]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        1210 months ago

        I take your point, and it’s a good one, but I’m also a pedantic ass, so I just wanted to say that a Chromebook is a computer. I know I’m sorry I’ll show myself out

        • @amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          710 months ago

          Lmao true, the reliance on the cloud and inability to install applications makes them feel like an entirelty different machine.

    • @minusthink@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      710 months ago

      Critical thinking is not the same as being immersed in a medium. This article conflates the two.

      There maybe a correlation at some level, because you cant critically think about a medium without any exposure.

      Especially early adopters might have more critical thinking skills, in general, because they seek out new things and aren’t subject to everyone just having a phone. Thinking the status quo isn’t good enough or could be better is a critical thought.

      • @btaf45@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        510 months ago

        There maybe a correlation at some level, because you cant critically think about a medium without any exposure.

        On the flip side, there is also a counter correlation. Younger people do not have a lifetime of background memories to compare things to. If they hear a politician is “corrupt”, they have little idea how it compares to others on the scale between grave and trivial. And if judging if a president is good or bad, they don’t know how to compare them to previous presidents.

        • @minusthink@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          310 months ago

          Absolutely.

          The US does not teach much critical thinking, as another poster pointed out. We de-emphasize the humanities and make STEM rote memorization based.

          Why they think kids should just be better at it than grown adults idk