@Jakdracula@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 11 months agox last nightlemmy.worldimagemessage-square104fedilinkarrow-up11.78Kfile-text
arrow-up11.78Kimagex last nightlemmy.world@Jakdracula@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 11 months agomessage-square104fedilinkfile-text
I posted this earlier today in the tech lemmy instance, but, they have no sense of humor and deleted it. I’m trying here.
minus-square@DavidRay@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish6•11 months agoNope, T A X is an acceptable alternative spelling for E A T.
minus-square@Robaque@feddit.itlinkfedilinkEnglish4•11 months agoNah, for them, taxes would just be another small hurdle to squash
minus-square@jarfil@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink2•11 months agoMake it a tiered hurdle: top tier, above $1M, 98% income taxes.
minus-square@fidodo@lemmy.worldcakelinkfedilink6•11 months agoThe joke is that Twitter put a giant X Sign on the roof of their building so the edit needs to include an X
minus-squareResol van Lemmylinkfedilink1•11 months agoTaxing the rich, and then eating them. What could possibly go wrong?
They spelled EAT wrong.
Nope, T A X is an acceptable alternative spelling for E A T.
Nah, for them, taxes would just be another small hurdle to squash
Make it a tiered hurdle: top tier, above $1M, 98% income taxes.
The joke is that Twitter put a giant X Sign on the roof of their building so the edit needs to include an X
¿Por que no los dos?
Taxing the rich, and then eating them. What could possibly go wrong?