Everybody loves Wikipedia, the surprisingly serious encyclopedia and the last gasp of Old Internet idealism!
(90 seconds later)
We regret to inform you that people write credulous shit about “AI” on Wikipedia as if that is morally OK.
Both of these are somewhat less bad than they were when I first noticed them, but they’re still pretty bad. I am puzzled at how the latter even exists. I had thought that there were rules against just making a whole page about a neologism, but either I’m wrong about that or the “rules” aren’t enforced very strongly.
OP says about “write credulous shit about ‘AI’” implying that both articles are non-credulous. The former article is thoroughly cited.
OP clearly doesn’t want either article to exist. I’m simply asking what’s the source that goes against the existing article and its citations.