How would you even know it’s internal only without testing? No doctor worth their salt would tell you that without tests. You should really see an allergist to cover the basics.
- 0 Posts
- 32 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Cake day: June 3rd, 2023
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Allergen blood tests aren’t very great. The skin prick test by an allergist is the gold standard.
2·11 days agodoes it run well on linux?
1·14 days agoso?
removing the credit from the original creator is despicable
30·15 days agoI think the smile and shrug strategy is the best option here! Just think of it as affirming, since he doesn’t recognize you at all.
4·22 days agoi would have done the same thing, not expecting it to be in two parts
6·23 days agoa ram drive is volatile memory. you can get higher performance out of DRAM chips attached to the CPU memory controller, versus putting them behind the PCIe bus using NVME. for applications that only work with file systems, a RAM drive works around that limitation. so, why bother?
because ram drives are easy to accomplish the same thing in software for applications that need it
1·27 days agothis is musk’s team - they are not competent enough to get to that level of surveillance (yet) not like they care about cause anyways
avoiding eggs because of this is silly, as so many types of food need refrigeration too. if you can’t trust someone to cook eggs within the 4 hour window after being removed from refrigeration, how can you trust them to not do the same with any meats or dairy?
3·1 month agopoetry
dressing up your pet feature request up as a bug report isn’t going to work
whatever it is you’re trying to do, be careful that your pi-hole DNS on port 53 is not exposed to the internet. otherwise your server will be abused for DDOS amplification attacks.
1·1 month agohave you tried updating?
1·2 months agoThere are many places on Earth where DNS servers have high latency, low bandwidth, and intermittent connectivity, yet still function fine. It’s already a solved problem.
Calling for the obvious action in response to a complaint is not homework. It’s Wikipedia, it can be edited by anyone who is willing to deal with the process.
If you or OP doesn’t want to do it, someone else will - and they already have, it seems.
This is, in fact, exactly what I pointed out. The former article is thoroughly cited, so it would be likely included.
The latter article is poorly cited and likely violates some rule, so it should be nominated for deletion (and it has been).
nope