• itslilith
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    What exactly does nuclear change about Russia, China and the middle east? That’s a massive non-sequitur

    Besides, think of China what you will, they’ve been key in driving large scale cheap solar

    • Black History Month@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Nuclear is the only energy that really solves our problems. Nothing to really be confused about there.

      You’re taking solar for granted. You’re not asking the important questions. Like, what if they wont sell to us anymore, what’s the human cost of human life? Can you honestly openly hold solar as some separate high accomplishment against the genocides China and Russia are openly complicit it?

      • itslilith
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The same can be said for nuclear. Potentially even more so. 3 countries produce almost all of the world’s uranium. What if they stop selling? You can build a domestic solar panel industry if you want, you can’t magic a uranium deposit under your feet. Nuclear is slow, expensive and a national security risk. Renewables are none of these things. Stop shilling for the energy companies that want to keep their monopolies.

        • Black History Month@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Silliness. Your counterpoints are valid, but mostly restate my last comment with somehow even less sense. Buying solar panels from China isn’t more a national security risk than uranium from Australia? I don’t think you really have a well though out point here.

          I’ll restate my own here for posterity and leave you to it. Solar from China Russia bad. Nuclear from literally anyone else good. Nuclear is safer, cheaper, and more efficient in every way at scale.

          Remember, solar is untenable, poorly adopted, and is actively being pumped in price. This is as cheap as it will ever be all things equal. Nuclear has had none of those luxuries. If you think the price drop of a untenable solution is impressive, wait until you see one that really works.

          • itslilith
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            Nuclear is consistently among the most expensive ways to generate power, and only afloat due to massive government subsidies, especially when it comes to waste storage. Whereas solar and wind are only beaten (in some metrics) by natural gas when it comes to power per dollar, getting even cheaper at scale.

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cost_of_electricity_by_source

            Your original point was that renewables are being blocked by China, Russia and the Middle East. I disagree on China, but that’s not the point. How will nuclear, with all strings attached, succeed there, whereas solar and wind won’t? Silliness.

      • WoodScientist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Like, what if they wont sell to us anymore, what’s the human cost of human life?

        Come on, you’re smarter than that. Are you seriously asking, “what happens if China cuts off our supply of solar panels?” Are you a troll, or just dense?

        Think about it. Just think about that for one god-damned second. Solar panels last for DECADES. And even after decades they still retain 75-80% of their original capacity. We move everything to solar, and then China cuts us off from new panels. So then…oh no…we can’t get any replacement panels. Clearly the whole nation will collapse!

        Of course not. Unless you’re Mr. Burns, you’re not blockading the fucking Sun. This isn’t oil, or natural gas, or uranium someone can blockade or embargo. If the US gets cut off from new Chinese solar panels, we have literally DECADES to ramp up our own production until things really become a problem.