

The better strategy at this point is to draw a clear and simple distinction that the everyone can easily understand - the Democratic party doesn’t redistrict without a new census and they don’t ever say they’re drawing districts just to disadvantage…
Hello, I’m the average voter, and I just fell asleep when you said “mid-census redistricting” and something about tyrants.
This is a losing strategy. The other strategy is probably also a losing strategy, but at least it’s going down swinging. The single greatest thing Democrats could do to get people in a voting booth is run on an anti-corruption, progressive economic agenda and show some backbone.
Washington has a bipartisan redistricting commission by state constitutional amendment. They would need the cooperation of Republicans to reconvene the bipartisan redistricting commission, then the cooperation of Republicans to gerrymander away eastern Washington (the areas they come from). It won’t happen. They may be able to make a purple district more safe.
The bipartisan commission does give a disproportionate voice to Republicans relative to actual apportionment in the state legislature by giving each of the top two parties two seats (with a nonvoting chair), but it’s a direct result of the unambiguous wording of the amendment. There would need to be another amendment to update that commission’s composition.