Ah, but is it gayer to be a big husky bear who likes big husky bears, or to be a slim femme twink who likes big husky bears?

This is not necessarily true. The subset [0, 1) of the real numbers has an upper bound of 1, but it does not contain its upper bound, therefore there is no maximal element. How matter how gay you are, it’s always possible to be a little gayer.

You’re assuming gayness is both integral one-dimensional and integral.

Personally, I think gayness is homomorphic to the set ℝ².

I believe they’re referring to Dessalines. Not Trump.

My dude, if people have to go away and read other things in order to understand what you were trying to communicate, then you did a bad job at communication.

Wilhoit’s law.

Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.

What’s poor old Luxembourg ever done to offend you so?

I’m not shipping, you’re shipping.

The guy spent years being an anti-feminist generally, and shitting himself over every little thing Anita Sarkeesian ever said or did in particular, while being unable to grasp even the most basic of feminist positions. So, I’m not entirely surprised that he’s currently being ignored.

Not necessarily. https://www.oxfordlearnersdictionaries.com/definition/english/attender

I apologise. It was elucubra who said “yeah no” and not you.

And you saying “yeah, no” doesn’t constitute a rebuttal. There’s nothing in the Qur’an that isn’t in the Bible vis-à-vis the treatment of women. The only difference between Islamic societies is that they’ve convinced more people to take it literally, and it absolutely can happen in the US.

Fair cop.

You don’t receive shares for free. You receive shares in return for your labour. You don’t become an equal member of a partnership as soon as you join.

Of course I feel sad for them. The people of New Orleans deserve better than having swasticars in their midst.

What should they have said, then? That they want Ukraine to lose and surrender? That they want the stalemate to continue indefinitely?

I think this is largely untrue. The public might have slightly left-wing views when it comes to the economy and state services, but I’d stake any money that if it was remotely feasible to build a net down the middle of the English channel to keep out the small boats, they’d be clamouring for it.

Benevolent dictator for life.

Looks more like a swastivan to me, TBF.

Please explain how you think that article relates to anything that has been said in this thread. No one other than you has tried to draw an equivalence between the holocaust and any other genocide.