If it’s the first one when why the fuck is it called the 4004 and not just the 1?!
If it’s the first one when why the fuck is it called the 4004 and not just the 1?!
Not sure where you got “hundreds” from. It was 40 that were sent to him by someone else. Plus a bunch of other stuff which wasn’t of minors (but obviously age isn’t the only criteria for legally or morality, so I’m unsure if the rest was “legit”).
He got into trouble because they were offered and whilst he initially declined them, he later changed his mind and accepted them (by saying “go on” after being offered again later on), knowing full well what they were.
And that’s where he crossed the line.
He had a great job and reputation over decades of work on TV. Then he goes and does that and destroys everything. Not his smartest move, for sure.
Classic Leon
Factually inaccurate.
Soon… Any … Day… Now… https://youtu.be/KbgvSi35n6o
Bitch lasagna
I think climate change will top that list soon.
Some people really will believe anything, as long as you’re trash talking big tech. And this platform is particularly bad.
Just say something like you should be paying for YouTube (via ads or premium) and brace for the swarm.
Scotland? Australia? Armenia?
We were supposed to stop?!
Eh. Germany weren’t the colossal dickheads in WWI that they were in WWII. Frankly most of Europe had a part to play in sparking the first one.
What? No. What utter nonsense.
I should be able to remove a website that I created and paid for without there being some silly law that I have to archive it.
As the owner, it’s up to me if I want it up or not. After all, I’m paying for the bloody thing.
Just buy an older supported device if grapheneos is important to you. Something like a 6 pro would be fine.
Why did a moderator remove my comment?
Do you want this place to die? Because excessive moderation is how this place dies.
Removed by mod
It’s not even that.
There is a huge lack of insight into who owns the copyright of an NFT. This confusion likely stems from the fact that an NFT comprises two things: (i) the identifiable, non-fungible, non-replicable, and transferrable cryptographic asset recorded on the blockchain, and (ii) the creative content. The creative content is separate and distinct from the actual asset recorded on the blockchain. As such, the person or entity that created the creative content owns the copyright. The content creator continues to own the copyright, even if the NFT is sold to someone else. It’s analogous to Jeff Koons selling artwork he created—Koons can sell the art to one person to hang on their wall, but since Jeff also owns the copyright, he can sell that same artwork as an image on t-shirts.
https://bpp.msu.edu/magazine/nfts-what-you-need-to-know-to-protect-copyrights-june2022/
NFTs are literally just URLs, pointlessly stored on “the blockchain”. URLs that point to servers which can be switched off at any moment.
Unless the pidgin team are compiling the binaries themselves, this doesn’t really fix much.
Ideally we need reproducible builds.
That’s fake. Looks very photoshopped.
My old Sony android phone did a factory reset in my pocket because I supposedly got the unlock code wrong a few times.
I never touched the damned thing and the first I knew about it was because my pocket felt warm.