I mod a worryingly growing list of communities. Ask away if you have any questions or issues with any of the communities.

I also run the hobby and nerd interest website scratch-that.org.

  • 3.5K Posts
  • 3.58K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle



  • I don’t believe I’ve ever let an RT score sway my decision to watch something. I sometimes forget RT exists until someone else brings it up.

    If RT had any sway on me I wouldn’t have watched and loved Arena (1989), American Ninja (1975), Screamers (1995), Chopping Mall (1986), or Dead Heat (1988) just to name a few excellent viewing experiences.


  • SSTF@lemmy.worldtoFunny@sh.itjust.worksRotten Tomatoes
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Indeed. The RT scoring favors inoffensive, wide appeal over interesting but not-for-everyone movies.

    People act like it’s some kind of dunk when a movie/show they like gets high rating, despite the often useless nature of critics and/or audiences at large to reflect individual taste.


  • SSTF@lemmy.worldtoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world[Deleted]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    First, we have to agree on what a plot hole is.

    My definition of a plot hole in a story is something that simply can not happen given the existing rules of the story, or something which could only happen in an unexplained and if not literally impossible than at least so unlikely it is practically impossible way that defies everything else we know about the story.

    This would be an item inexplicably jumping locations, a character having knowledge they could not possibly have, or a character or item being in two places at once. Things like that which gnarl the story.

    What it isn’t: A character making a bad decision, a character acting unusual (even to the point of acting out of character- that can be bad writing, but not a plot hole), a character forgetting something, a plot contrivance, an unlikely coincidence, something being unrealistic but consistent within the context of the story.

    I commonly see poorly written scenes, or scenes where someone thinks a character was acting irrationally, or scientific or legal or other plot points that are intentionally written to serve the story described as plot holes.

    With that description, I’d say quite a great number of works of fiction don’t have plot holes.




  • I tried watching SWAT and found it tiring, since almost every episode ended in some kind of action set piece takedown. Done on a TV budget, those setpieces tended to be underwhelming. The show being in a theoretically realistic setting started to clash with the team getting in so many high profile gunfights.

    I just don’t think the formula exactly works. There’s two directions it could go to be great. One, turn it into The Shield with some quality drama and running plots with heavy themes. Two, turn the city into a Robocop/Predator 2 type over the top hellscape with absurd overarmed gangs of cackling thugs roaming the streets, and acknowledge the absurdity of weekly giant gunfights by folding into the setting.

    I doubt the show runners are brave enough or interested enough to do either.




  • Things go differently in the current canon, but what you described was more or less what happened in the old EU. There was no line of succession or instructions for what happened if Palpatine died. His death, along with Vader and important central figures in the Empire in ROTJ left a lot of squabbling Moffs and Admirals of dubious levels of competence in control of splinters of the Empire.

    It wasn’t until Thrawn that someone competent started consolidating Imperial forces again.












  • I don’t think this comic exactly applies; I’m not commenting about people not knowing some bit of trivia. Even if you didn’t grow up with the classic Simpsons, I don’t know how you can’t notice how old and stiff all the main cast sound. Marge sounds older than the voice acting for her mother in classic episodes.

    My question is genuine when I ask who is watching these new episodes. Are they people who grew up with the classics who are somehow hanging on? Are they a new, younger audience? Either way, I don’t see what the appeal is. The older audience knows the classic episodes, and the younger audience seems to have many choices for animation that seem a lot more in step with them and without a distractingly aged main voicecast.