

You can speak in goo-goo ga-ga talk but I’ll interpret that active choice of lingo as coming from the mind of an infant
You can speak in goo-goo ga-ga talk but I’ll interpret that active choice of lingo as coming from the mind of an infant
I understood that much. Take it up with shneancy@lemmy.world for what their interpretation requires.
The set dressing either should have been communicated clearer to not be confusing or wholly omitted.
Ok, then a person who uses “her” as a pronoun rather than exclusively a woman.
All other criteria are essential to meet the apparent meaning of the joke.
I fed a hundred 5 star chefs’ dinners to a dog and then the dog shit them out but I still made the dogshit
A fuckup that specifically in line with what the Führer wants is no accident
They adapt into more extreme forms of assholery, whether they recognize it or not
I thought this was an actual photo of Bananarea 51
“According to Darwin’s Origin of Species, it is not the most intellectual of the species that survives; it is not the strongest that survives; but the species that survives is the one that is able best to adapt and adjust to the changing environment in which it finds itself.”
Counterpoint: I am tired of this earth. These people. I am tired of being caught in the tangle of their lives.
Yes, that’s why the first thing I said was asking if it was meant to be comprehensible because I could not parse a clear and singular intent behind it for reasons I’ve already mentioned. “Incomprehensible” is a genre of media, especially for TikTok.
I’d understand the scenario and perhaps even find it funny if the joke-teller were to provide the essential context
It’s relatable to only a small percentage of people (fraction of people who are interested in relationships with women, subset people who are in relationships with women, subset people whose women partner is phone obsessed, subset people who cannot independently shop for groceries, subset people who while grocery shopping have had their women partner fail to answer her phone, subset people who have this happen routinely or significantly enough to even notice or care). You will see others saying that it’s relatable but that will just be confirmation bias.
And for each person who has experienced this, they only once could have experienced it as the image describes since black holes do not relinquish the matter they absorb. Who even would be in a relationship with somebody who is both on their phone 24/7 and be short distance enough to share groceries? The hyperbole is too literal and becomes nonsensical rather than comedic.
“word salad and non-sequitors without premise” is genuinely a common aim and market for TikTok media. It was only a criticism if that wasn’t what the joke-teller was going for, and that’s what I wanted clarification of.
You asked the community for context and I provided a version of it based on having heard that joke before.
Last I heard, even historians have yet to come up with the context or meaning for that joke.
those are both assumptions
Then don’t assert those claims with such absolutism and authority?
you are angry about
What part about the ancient Sumerian dog joke made you laugh?
The fact that it’s choosing an eye to open so it can see?
Where are you getting these assumptions from? Also, your comment comes across as really condescending and preachy imo. It’s like you think I don’t understand what a joke is or that all these moments will be lost in time like tears in rain.
Between late stage capitalism, religious puritanism, and outside enemy states, who is doing the most to condition our population to become willfully vapid and ignorant?
Do I still have to upload my ID to listen to you on Spotify?
You posted this on what is literally the third shortest day in recorded history
It’s not my fault I may make stupid errors - I blame the hazards of my environment
I’m finding no matches for this image or some text on it, so it seems like you made this meme and posted it onto a forum which has only a couple of those criteria as its actual rules. Is this just bad faith smear campaigning to stir shit against this community and/or its mods?
Rule 3 is also the only one of these rules that is the slightest bit dubious. The rest are justifiable for most audiences and mod teams, assuming there’d be a reasonable time limit to when reposting would be permissible.