riseuppikmin [he/him, any]

Ask me how to emulate anything please I’m begging you don’t buy that game

  • 2 Posts
  • 17 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: May 19th, 2022

help-circle
  • Speculative questions/observations.

    It seems obvious to me that as these trials go on that Republicans are going to use increasingly brazenly corrupt means to dodge/alter/fire D.A.s/pardon crimes.

    Is this in conjunction with various state legislator shenanigans and districting bullshit i.e. how Alabama and Ohio (and also potentially Tennessee depending on an on-going lawsuit) are going to ignore re-draw orders to wait out the clock and use the psychotically gerrymandered maps for 2024 enough to get the U.S. to actual cool-zone balkanization discussions or are even things this openly corrupt and in plain sight not enough to get the ball rolling?

    I know (well guess) that ultimately US balkanization rests on either capital deciding that the state of things are too untenable for its profit interests and/or the evangelical base in the states to start trying to express state-captured power openly, but I guess I’m asking do you think the continually escalating corruption is enough to get liberals to actually push back in some concrete, non-performative way.

    I guess I’m wondering what level of overt corruption sparks these conversations in the mainstream (or even if that discourse is possible).


  • Copied the full post over as I imagine it gets buried under the news

    Things to get out of the way:

    • I know a U.S. president can’t pardon state level crimes
    • I know the Georgia governor can’t pardon state crimes in Georgia

    In Georgia a council, appointed by the governor, has the pardon power in the state after it was stripped from GA governors because of corruption in the past.

    As far as I’m aware (per coverage of things tonight), that council is all Republican and only has loose self-imposed guidelines/norms about the process by which a person can apply for a pardon.

    Why do liberals think this is a slam dunk when that council can seemingly at any time change these rules to the extent of even giving a preemptive pardon? The governor can’t replace these people instantly as they’re on some x year term scheme.

    Is this just more hopeful “the walls are closing in” or am I missing something here?

    Edit also the Georgia state republicans gave themselves the power to fire D.A.s in 2 weeks time. It’s obvious this is going to be used, no?










  • Some things that would make me consider it:

    • Free high quality lunches every day
    • Transportation compensation in the form of both work time (if the office is poorly located) and monetary compensation for transportation expenses
    • Management improvement plan with actions they’re taking/implementing to reduce the time they’re wasting of laborers on a day-to-day basis
    • Alteration of the company structure to force a large percentage (simple majority) of ownership to workers to push back against reactionary and profit-driven anti-labor whims of shareholders
    • Services/compensation that complete tasks that previously I could do during downtime at home
    • Yearly inflation-pegged CoL raises that apply to every laborer in the company before salary raises are made
    • Massive investment in in-office employee training programs in the form of role-based training that is chosen by laborers in that particular role/function

    If every single one of these things were implemented I would then still probably leave the place for another WFH job if we didn’t use our new ownership powers to revert back to WFH immediately.