My guess is because a linter and/or HLS was suggesting it. I know HLS used to suggest making your fields strict in almost all cases. In this case I have a hunch that it slightly cuts down on memory usage because we use almost all Muls either way. So it does not need to keep the string it is parsed from in memory as part of the thunk.
But it probably makes a small/negligible difference here.
Of course it’s point-free
True. I love how AoC is a hotbed for creative and/or insane ways of solving coding problems.
If you wanna check out how it goes in Nix: https://git.sr.ht/~kintrix/aoc2024
Java
Nix, because I hate myself. No, it is very much not made for this purpose. But it’s possible to use if for this.
<$> is just fmap as an infix operator.
>>> fmap (+1) [1,2,3]
[2,3,4]
>>> (+1) <\$> [1,2,3]
[2,3,4]
An advent calendar of coding puzzles. Dec 1-25 you get a new puzzle every day
I definitely am: https://git.sr.ht/~kintrix/aoc2024
(The README is wrong, just copied it over from last year)
That is basically the problem. Also that fractional scaling on Linhx generally still gives blurry results. Fractional scaling without explicit support from the apps side is very difficult to implement.
And yes, there are a ton of of apps that don’t correctly respect OS hints for size. Even more common among apps that aren’t Linux first, or are proprietary.
Hey. I realize this post is 5 months olf so probably not relevant anymore… But I wanna say that the setting sounds really cool for the campaign. I would like to find out more about the story of the setting, so if you’d still want to run at least one session then I’d like to join in for at least a session if that’s fine. If you do still look for a player do know that I am relatively new to D&D and TTRPGs in general, only played a few one-shots.
Also, this whole post was a great read, even if not an uplifting one. Unfortunately, I cannot contribute at all about who I think was in the right and who wasn’t, I don’t like making a judgement when hearing a story from one person’s perspective. Sorry about that.
I would love to hear the story of how it went if you are down
I have largely the same opinion as the accepted answer on this RPG Stackexchange post.
That is, while the enemy is paying attention to you, you are not stealthed, you would not be able to sneakily snatch a pouch or unused weapons. But you can try to cut the straps holding them.
Personally, I would probably rule it like this:
If you actually try to go close in and grab a pouch and hold it in your hands, then after the Sleight of Hand check they get an opportunity attack on you, because you are focused on trying to snatch an object. They notice that opening to strike. And it would use their reaction. But again, this is my personal opinion.
I think the baseline of what I would want is:
I genuinely think Youtube premium is alrightish as it is. I wouldn’t pay for it; though, since I do not want to give my money to Google. They are getting enough out of me that I don’t want to give them.
I honestly just want the alternatives, like PeerTube, to have a funding model, which allows creators to get paid. Donations? Sure. Optionally ads? Sure. I think peertube having opt-in ads that go to the creator would go a long way.
Don’t know if it’s succesful, but definitely just straight up stupid.
The are many places where it’s not even allowed because it does not meet the local safety and protection standards. It’s a fundamentally unsafe design, especially for the people outside of it. It should not be allowed on the roads, and the EU agrees with this.
Even if it was allowed within the EU, you would need a special driver’s licence for it.