Hildegarde

There is no record of this bio

  • 3 Posts
  • 578 Comments
Joined 8 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 7th, 2024

help-circle
  • I’m really looking forward coming back to this community tomorrow, with the knowledge that many deeply unpleasant people have been banned and will not be around anymore.

    The moderators of this community do an exquisite job. Rules are enforced, but with kindness. All rule breaking is treated as an honest mistake, unless proven otherwise.

    Even though this thread is filled with vitriol, there is no censorship. No comments were removed by moderators. Bans are not applied retroactively.

    Thanks so much for the work you do for this community! Keep it up! ❤️❤️❤️







  • I would guess the link was to a post on the lemmyshitpost community on lemmyworld. There was a meme that mentioned this community and is now gone.

    It was a meme about writing a “banger” comment and then deleting it to respect the women’s only rule. Discussion did what you would expect.

    This community here at womensstuff is a women’s only place that is quite nice.









  • Hildegardeto196cyber rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    Both keys can be used to encrypt files that only the other key can read. When sending encrypted messages you generally encrypt with both the sender’s private key, and the recipients public key, so that the recipient can decrypt the document, but they can also know it was sent from who they expect.

    You verify the public key by decrypting something encrypted by the private key.


  • Hildegardeto196cyber rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    For that, the government needs to be in the middle of the communication channel. That would take a lot more than just replacing the key on the keyserver.


  • Hildegardeto196cyber rule
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’ve not actually done this in practice. There is software that does that. The thing that will get you caught leaking sensitive information is when you have revealed something somewhere. If this newspaper publishes sensitive information you have access to, someone will see that your lemmy account was specifically asking about sending to that specific publisher.

    Most journalists know how to protect sources. Some don’t. Make sure you vet whoever you are communicating with.



  • Hildegardeto196cyber rule
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    3 days ago

    That is not a viable attack. You can verify keys. Modern encryption is robust. A modified key would not be able to decrypt anything encrypted by the publisher. The key would be obviously fake to anyone who tried to verify it. And if the publisher found out about this, they have the means to get the word out they’re literally a news organization.

    Governments are probably tracking the downloads of keys. That’s the much more reasonable threat from keyservers. If they can prove you had access to sensitive information, and downloaded the public key of the journal that published it, they’ve got you. Printing the key mitigates that risk.