Capitalism is not addressing the tragedy of the commons, fascism is addressing it by stealing the resources from others, communism is a transgender polycule having an orgy behind the dumpster at dennys after a 3am rave party.
Capitalism is not addressing the tragedy of the commons, fascism is addressing it by stealing the resources from others, communism is a transgender polycule having an orgy behind the dumpster at dennys after a 3am rave party.
Try that in a small town
They did, they got their asses beat, they are going to lose their jobs, face jail time, and have to spend the rest of their lives as poor convicted felons who will not even be allowed to work at McDonalds and probably die in some ditch somewhere, and when they get to hell and see all the bipoc trans muslim drag queens in heaven raining down molten lead over their cursed cumskin bodies plagued with every curable disease with a vaccine, they will cry out “oh why god have you persecuted me so”, and she will reply “because I thought it was funny”, and then all white people burn in hell for eternity and everyone claps.
Mao was right for sending the dumb fucking city kids into the countryside. If you don’t spend enough time in nature you end up like that guy on Reddit who cries every time they leave an urban area.
In what fucking world are you living in that cityskylines is carbrained?
Does any part of your plan involve forced relocation of people living in the suburbs?
The same thing that happens when it rains in the city?
Comrade that 3rd article is unironically supportive of trophy hunting. Also ecofascists don’t own the concept of “tragedy of the commons”. We don’t disagree with malthusians that resources are limited, we disagree on how to allocate resources.
I heard 40 billion was the theoretical carrying capacity for earth, if human consumption was minimized. As communists we don’t really want to stop technological or population growth, we want people to stop eating meat and driving cars and living in single family houses and yes we want people to choose to have less kids but we generally don’t agree with forced population control measures. We believe that we can allocate the finite resources of earth in a manner conductive towards human existence.
Malthusians and ecofascists want to stop technological and:or population growth so that western levels of consumption can be maintained. A malthusian would rather have a world with half a billion people not asking how it gets down that low, meanwhile a communist wants more people, they want humanity to flourish and grow, maybe not exponentially, maybe they want humanity to reach an equilibrium where births and deaths are equal.
What I’m saying is, resources are limited and there’s a regressive and progressive approach to the issue, and the malthusian approach is the regressive one. And communism is naturally the antithesis to malthusian. And off in the corner wearing a dunce cap drooling is capitalism which does not believe we will run out of fossil fuels.
What does any of this mean, idk fuck Ted Kaczynski.