Hunting still purposefully kills individuals who don’t want to die. “Population control” wouldn’t be necessary if hunting organisations didn’t purposefully increase populations in order to have more to hunt. And eating their flesh is necessary in what way? Why not leave it to the wild animals then?
Your examples are extremely weird, friend. When comparing and contrasting countries, how about focusing on politics? The USA is an imperialist oligarchy with a giant, globe-spanning military presence, dominating and exploiting economies under threat of violence and sanctions, while Russia is an irridentist oligarchy that can apply pressure on other countries through little more than it’s fairly large military force. If Russia had the same resources and trade-presence as the USA they would be almost identical. If you really want to talk about cultural values, they are generally the same. The average human being cares about peace, justice, love, joy, truth, freedom, beauty. The differences are political.
Had some random leftovers to throw in a pot 🙂
Cronometer ist ein ziemlich gutes Werkzeug, um Nährstoffmengen ausrechnen zu lassen. Am Anfang habe ich damit immer Mahlzeiten im Voraus geplant und nach einer Weile hatte ich das weitgehend genug verinnerlicht, dass ich jetzt nurnoch bei neuen Zutaten nachsehe. Die andere Ressource, die mir sehr geholfen hat, ist Nutritionfacts.org auf YouTube. Die konzentrieren sich meistens auf einzelne Zutaten und ihre Effekte auf den Metabolismus.
Das Problem am Töten Unschuldiger ist natürlich das Schlachthaus, also spritzt das Blut ab sofort auf der Wiese 👍
It’s a group of probably mostly teenagers and upwards, mocking anti-vegan and pro-animal-abuse positions. It is very online tho, for sure.
Are you aware how this community works? It’s for satire of meatheadded talking points for vegans to enjoy and make fun of and everyone here is usually sarcastic. The point of this post is most likely to humorously showcase the flawed logic of people arguing that the abolishment of breeding animals would constitute a genocide.
My most genuine wish would be to see the people caring about mutilation, consent and bodily autonomy to take a look at what we do to non-humans in animal agriculture, apply their convictions consistently and go vegan.
The alternative is not breeding living beings just to imprison and exploit them. Going extinct isn’t “bad”, especially when the alternative is what we currently inflict on them. That said, you can always support sanctuaries. You know those places taking in animals that specifically don’t have a literal “meat-program”?
It’s a peeled sweet potato, half a cup of red lentils, a leek, and a piece of a celery root shortly cooked and left to sit for 15 minutes in a simple vegetable broth. Then I added garlic, pepper, cilantro and turmeric.
Animal farming necessitates rights violation against innocents, regardless of scale. Unjust imprisonment, rape and murder are, in fact, immoral. And doing it all for personal gain because you enjoy a specific feeling on your tongue makes it worse. Attempting to justify immoral acts with “nonhuman animals do it too” is pointless as you don’t use animal behaviour as a guide for any other aspect of your life.
Why kill innocent chickens for mouth-pleasure tho
It looks delicious! Also ‘scallion’ sounds like a fantasy critter of some kind so that’s extra neat.
“Our meat program” Literal support for the corpseflesh industry isn’t “vegan”. If you want to keep animals away from slaughter, support actual sanctuaries that aren’t threatening to kill anyone, or take a bolt cutter and break the cages and fences yourself.
Growing your own vegetables, nice 💚
It does! You should go vegan and adopt a diet that doesn’t rely on harm against animals though 🙂
I don’t know what the problem is? Child labour is generally eco-friendly and has a long tradition and in some places it’s just normal. Not everyone can afford to pay for services or install fancy alarm systems. We have a symbiotic relationship with orphans and putting them to work for us strengthens our unbreakable bond. Not to mention that using children for labour can help preserve certain breeds that have been traditionally bred for work purposes. In some cases, if these orphans are not utilized, there may be a risk of their extinction.
As an avid corpseflesh-enthusiast I love nothing more than rationalising my own bad choices by hiding behind the third world countries that my society made destitute in the first place. It reassures me so much in my own taking of innocent life, everyone should try it.
Why continue to breed them at all? Breeding them in the first place was immoral to begin with, you don’t fix that with more breeding. “I want aurochs to exist in the wilderness” is not a valid reason to continue someone’s imprisonment and denial of autonomy. Especially not when wild bovines like wisents already exist.
You could try and reintroduce the predators that were hunted instead of hunting more. And that doesn’t address the point of killing innocents for what, the environment? If environmental damage is a reason to kill someone wouldn’t humans be top of the list?