If two consenting adult intelligence feral or monster characters are banging, I don’t see the problem. It’s weird if it’s a human and one. Extra weird if they’re juveniles. I find the argument over furries having too many animal characteristics a little dumb as they’re animals with human traits… Some walk upright, some wear clothes, others only shirts, some are more animal-like and others are more human-like.
Simba, Robin Hood, Judy Hopps, Balto, Pinkie Pie, and the Wolf from Shrek are all furries. Some act more like wild animals. Some act more like humans with clothes and jobs. Some only wear clothes sometimes. All of them are enculturated adults and can consent with other like creatures.
I’ve lately seen people nitpicking these details, and at this point, it seems some people won’t be pleased with NSFW furry art unless there are no animal characteristics whatsoever. So then it would be art of humans and not furries at all.
My brother in Christ, if I steal all of your writings and art when you’re not looking, chop them up, eat them, and shit them out, they are still your creations-- just now covered in shit, garbled up, and without your original thoughts and intentions put behind them. If I then sell the pile of shit to someone, I am profiting from your labor.
I would be less inclined to hate this if I got some form of royalty or even some form of compensation for the hours and hours I’ve spent planning, creating, editing, and studying to make my things.