Still nothing of value to say and your literacy is incredibly poor. Must be very young.

Absolute degenerate here.

You’re the first lowlife I have called a propagandist. The shoe fits.

You did not use it correctly. At all. Russian imperialism and the poor positioning of tankies is well documented. It is not anecdotal. Absolutely braindead.

And I seriously doubt you have any real work to do at such a young age.

Your tankie philosophy is nothing but hypocrisy. That would be the incoherent part. Which makes it ironic you would say that.

Please explain, without using ChatGPT, how egalitarianism is incoherent.

Both spread Russian propaganda.

Examples - Ukraine started the war. Putin is not a dictator. Western/NATO expansion is aggressive encroachment and Russia has a sovereign duty to defend itself.

This last one is funny considering Russia no longer controls those territories and Russia themselves are the invaders.

Tankies are Russian and Chinese imperialists. They hate America for its imperialism, but love Russia and China for theirs. They’re also very pro-genocide while simultaneously denying genocides.

AnCaps want a stateless society, but it is a misdirection to install neo-feudalism. For some reason they believe they’ll be on top.

Jesus H Christ you have absolutely nothing of value to say.

I mean I get it, English as a second language is really hard, right comrade?

Wow, it took you two hours to thesaurus your way into an asinine statement. You don’t even know what anecdotal means!

The irony of a tankie saying I have an incoherent political philosophy. Lmao I must be talking to a 20 year old or a propagandist. You genuinely know nothing.

It is egalitarianISM by the way. You can’t even speak properly.

You’re putting words in my mouth. The US government, if it chose, could increase assistance with its programs in HUD. The government could increase the availability of housing vouchers in the meantime while transitioning to guaranteeing some form of housing for its citizens. You jumped to single family homes as if that’s the only option, but there are many alternatives. The government could also nationalize corporations that gouge renters. There are many steps to be taken instead of hand waving away anything that isn’t perfect. Why would you tear down existing buildings instead of providing any alternatives? Do you know how many vacant homes there are in America? Over 15 million.

All of this is a pipe dream with the current administration.

Lmao not even close. I am egalitarian.

Edited to be less hostile!

deleted by creator

Do you think they met, moved in, and got married in a week?

Yes, my extreme position of - I don’t believe people and corporations should own multiple properties while homelessness exists. I’m a true radical.

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator

deleted by creator