catculation@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agoASCII art elicits harmful responses from 5 major AI chatbotsarstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1254cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldascii_art@lemmy.world
arrow-up1254external-linkASCII art elicits harmful responses from 5 major AI chatbotsarstechnica.comcatculation@lemmy.zip to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.ziptechnology@lemmy.mltechnology@lemmy.worldascii_art@lemmy.world
minus-squarepufferfischerpulver@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·8 months agoTrue, but people generally understand hammers. Llms? Not so much
minus-squareArmok: God of Blood@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoNo one’s going after computer manufacturers or OS vendors because people use computers to commit cybercrime. I doubt most people could explain how an OS or motherboard works.
minus-squareAkrenion@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·8 months agoA lot of poluticians want hardwarelevel backdoors. It’s been declared unconstitutional quite some times in different countries but they are trying.
minus-squareWallEx@feddit.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·8 months agoThat would be soooo bad, almost as bad as making a law against encryption
True, but people generally understand hammers. Llms? Not so much
No one’s going after computer manufacturers or OS vendors because people use computers to commit cybercrime. I doubt most people could explain how an OS or motherboard works.
A lot of poluticians want hardwarelevel backdoors. It’s been declared unconstitutional quite some times in different countries but they are trying.
That would be soooo bad, almost as bad as making a law against encryption