• paholg@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 months ago

    What? You said you don’t like pride parades and the response was “don’t go then”. Not everything is for everyone.

    Do you want everyone who enjoys pride parades to change them to specifically cater to you?

    • solarbabies@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Lol no. I think that agreeing on higher standards for what kind of clothing and actions are not acceptable in public parades, would go a long way toward actually helping the LGBT+ community gain acceptance rather than hurting our image.

      • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        8 months ago

        We will never “gain acceptance” by dressing and acting the way conservatives want us to.

        Remember, these people are absolutely willing to define “being trans near children” as a sex crime. Our existence, to them, is a sick deviant perverted sex act. Two men holding hands in public is “grooming children”.

        When you draw these lines between the “acceptable queers” and everyone else, all you’re doing is putting yourself inside of a shrinking circle. That circle will eventually shrink to the point where even you, the acceptable queer, no longer fit inside it, because our entire existence is fundamentally unacceptable to them. And when that happens, there will be no one else left to stand in solidarity with you.

        • solarbabies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I never drew that line, you did for your strawman argument. Typical lib response tbh. I never said there are “acceptable queers” and “not acceptable queers”. I said we need to have standards for what is considered acceptable in the context of public parades.

          Conservatives are willing to define “being trans near children” as a sex crime, mostly b/c of the lies and misconceptions they get told/reinforced by conservative politicians and pastors about LGBT+, would you agree?

          And what do you think those politicians and pastors use as “evidence” that we are all sexual deviants? If you think images and photos of sexual behavior at Pride parades is not one of them, you’re mistaken. It’s a public display, and it’s easy for them to say “why aren’t these people classified as sex offenders for doing such heinous acts in public?”

          I stated a simple fact: pride parades currently hurt our image. People in this thread can’t seem to accept that.

          • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 months ago

            And, yet, a lot of us don’t give a shit if parades hurt our image with the cishets. Pride is for us. We could all show up wearing Mennonite clothing…overalls for mascs and androgynes and ankle length denim skirts for femmes…no flags, no banners, no music, no dancing, no PDA, no hand holding, nothing…just a bunch of queers in modest clothing going for a walk on a Saturday afternoon, and there would still be a large contingent of conservative cishets who would take offense just because we dare to exist outside.

            The whole lot of them can get fucked.

            • solarbabies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              8 months ago

              If you don’t give a shit what cishets think, then IMO you need to exit the fantasy world you live in and wake up to the real world where trans people are still getting fucking murdered

              This is what pisses me off about so many members of this community, you like to pretend we’ve already won and that cishets aren’t currently threatening to take over this country and reverse the policies we worked so hard to pass for the last 50 years!

              Come back when you’re ready to have a productive conversation about the advancement of our collective rights, and not your selfish desire to feel good in public no matter what others say.

              • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                You’re not listening. No one cares about your opinion. We’re gonna do us, you go and do you, and the bigots will hate all of us just as they have for centuries.

                • solarbabies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t need you to care about my opinion. I need you to care about more members of the community than just yourself. Which I can see is impossible for you.

                  • radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    8 months ago

                    I am trans. My kids are both trans. My best friend is trans. Two of their very good friends are trans. We all absolutely see what is happening in society. We got it. We’re right there with you. We just aren’t going to be fucking cowards like you and kowtow to bigots. We’re not gonna Oliver Twist them and beg for a few rights. We’re going to exist as fabulously as we want to, and they can either keep pissing and moaning, or they can just accept that we exist and have rights. And if they try to take those rights, well…leftists have guns too, you know.

          • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            You’re talking about people who claim to genuinely believe that schools are putting out litterboxes for children who identify as cats. Conservatives don’t need evidence, and never have. Genuinely, when have you ever seen a conservative make an evidence based argument against allowing our existence?

            Evidence doesn’t factor into their worldview. If it did, they wouldn’t be conservatives. They will appeal to it when convenient, and ignore it or invent it the rest of the time. We can be as refined and polite as we like, or as depraved and deviant as we like, and it will not matter one iota to how they view us. They will still work diligently towards our extermination either way, and they will make up as many lies about us as they have to along the way.

            You can try your best to be “one of the good ones”, but all that means is you get to be last one in the gas hut, after there are no more bodies left for you to shovel into the incinerator.

            • solarbabies@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              8 months ago

              Lmao you just did it again 🤣 you built up another strawman so you could knock it down 🤣

              The reason being: No, I’m not talking about that small minority of conservatives at all.

              YOU are the one being judgmental here, not them.

              Did you know in fact most conservatives aren’t crazy diabolical evil people? That’s a perception leftists tend to have b/c they don’t have any real conservative friends, they just get angry about stuff they see on the media and attribute it to all conservatives, saying “how could they support this kind of rhetoric? everyone who watches or supports this news source must be evil too!”

              Turns out when you actually try and talk to them, they’re people too.

              Only when you dehumanize your perceived enemies, do they actually become the inhumane enemies you wished never to create.

              • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                Clearly, I just imagined that conservative politicians all across the world have been eagerly trying to legislate away our right to exist. Thank God for that. I guess it was all just a terrible dream. It must have been all those “good”, “decent”, “kind hearted” conservatives who stood up to stop them, rather than just spouting some bullshit about being “Socially liberal, economically conservative”, or claiming that they “support gay and trans rights but just think all this woke nonsense has gone too far”, and then voting for those same people anyway.

                • solarbabies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  8 months ago

                  I don’t think you’re imagining things, I think you’re misinterpreting conservative’s tendency to have selfish priorities as evil, because they don’t consider you. When it’s purely them acting in their own self-interest; a difference in ideology. (Which you have judged and labeled, based on the actions of a few extremists.)

                  Have you ever heard of this book called the Bible? I know it’s taboo to bring up anywhere in LGBT+ communities, and rightly so! It’s mostly full of shit.

                  But for all the shitty, inconsistent takes Christianity has to offer, “love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you” was one of the better ones… and most leftists can’t even begin to imagine how.

                  And let me clarify: I’m not saying leftists should be tolerant of intolerant people’s actions.

                  I’m saying they should consider being tolerant of letting them into the room for discussion… b/c avoiding that is what blocks any meaningful progress from ever being made. Whereas if they would just do that, they might start to see a lot more positive outcomes, for both sides, a lot more quickly.

                  A smart enough radical leftist can destroy any conservative argument against LGBTQ+, would you agree?

                  And it’d be beneficial to the community at large if more bigots learned, by being loved and accepted while being told they’re wrong, to be more loving and accepting.

                  To me the unwillingness to have any discussions appears to be a reflection of the lack of confidence and conviction leftists actually have in their viewpoints - e.g. they preach “love and acceptance” while inciting more division and intolerance.

                  I’d be happy to be proved wrong on that, so that history stops repeating itself. Casting aside bigots just confirms their beliefs and strengthens their conviction that “they were right about X all along”. Hence the vicious cycle I’m referring to.

                  And if you want an example of someone who actually succeeded at what I’m talking about… look no further than Daryl “Motherfuckin’ G” Davis, the man who convinced 200 KKK members to leave.

                  Every other Christian looks like a fucking pre-nascent embryo of a person compared to this badass. I’d say he should’ve been declared a Saint by the church, but fuck them and their titles, he’s better than that.

                  At the end of the day, if you want to make progress, you have to start with what we have in common. And what do leftists have in common with right wingers? They both suck at cooperation.

                  To quote the 2018 research paper cited there:

                  Liberals show slightly more concern for their partners’ outcomes compared to conservatives (study 1), and in study 2 this relation is supported by a meta-analysis (r = .15). However, in study 1, political ideology did not relate to cooperation in general. Both Republicans and Democrats extend more cooperation to their in-group relative to the out-group, and this is explained by expectations of cooperation from in-group versus out-group members.

                  • Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    You’ve soared off on such a wildly different tangent here that it’s scarcely possible to even try responding to any of this. It has almost no bearing on what was being discussed.

                    No one here told you that we cannot ever engage with conservatives. For someone who likes to immediately throw the word “strawman” at people, you are incredibly energetic about building them.

                    But you will not ever successfully engage with them if your starting point is to agree to be the kind of person they want you to be. Because the moment you do that, they will move the goalposts. Why wouldn’t they? They’re already getting exactly what they want. They have no reason to engage with you.

                    Our existence is not negotiable. You’re more than welcome to sit and break bread with people who hate you. That’s a good and noble endeavour, and it can indeed be very successful. But the moment you decide that the behaviour of the entire LGBTQ community has to be policed in such a way as to cater to the comfort of people who hate us, you have sided with our oppressors. You are more than welcome to dress and act a certain way if it gets you in their door. That’s fine. But you don’t get to go around telling everyone else that they’re wrong for existing freely in a way that makes conservatives uncomfortable. Because they will keep on moving that line of discomfort until there is no more space for us to exist at all.