Personality certainly matters. But it might be more useful, in terms of the actual stakes of a contest, to think about the presidential election as a race between competing coalitions of Americans. Different groups, and different communities, who want very different — sometimes mutually incompatible — things for the country.

The coalition behind Joe Biden wants what Democratic coalitions have wanted since at least the presidency of Franklin Roosevelt: government assistance for working people, federal support for the inclusion of more marginal Americans.

As for the coalition behind Trump? Beyond the insatiable desire for lower taxes on the nation’s monied interests, there appears to be an even deeper desire for a politics of domination. Trump speaks less about policy, in any sense, than he does about getting revenge on his critics. He’s only concerned with the mechanisms of government to the extent that they are tools for punishing his enemies.

If you’re an American, and you like what the Democratic coalition is after, then get involved, help with money if you can, and pay attention to downballot races too, not just the top.

  • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah. Sure is funny how just enough Democrats always vote with the “other” coalition when it’s anything that might benefit the poor.

    • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      We don’t always get that - that’s how we got a child tax credit for a few years. It’s that enough Americans have been stampeded into “hate the other person, they have darker skin, a different religion, etc” that we don’t elect people who do want to benefit the general public instead of billionaires. Change how we vote, and policy can and will change to match.

      • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        We don’t always get that - that’s how we got a child tax credit for a few years.

        Joe Manchin made sure it died. The only democrat whose vote actually matters doubled child poverty. Thank you for illustrating my point.

        • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          9 months ago

          He did kill it — something like 48/50 Senate Democrats wanted to keep it, and every Republican wanted to get rid of it. That’s a reason to elect more and better Democrats, not to reject them entirely.

          • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            So you’re saying all the Republicans and just enough Democrats voted to double child poverty.

            “All the Republicans and just enough Democrats” is the only actual coalition in DC.

            • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 months ago

              Not always — when there are more and better Democrats we can actually change policy on this.

              • Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                If we get more Democrats, We’ll still have just enough Manchins. I remember the last time we had a supermajority.

                • silence7@slrpnk.netOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  That’s why I talk about electing both more and better. They don’t have to be Manchins; you can see this at the state level with the kinds of policy changes you get in places like Michigan when Democrats start to hold a supermajority.