The statute, which can lead to reproductive coercion in a state that has banned abortion, has recently gained nationwide attention

At six months pregnant, H decided enough was enough. She had endured years of abuse from her husband and had recently discovered he was also physically violent towards her child. She contacted an attorney to help her get a divorce.

But she was stopped short. Her lawyer told her that she could not finalize a divorce in Missouri because she was pregnant. “I just absolutely felt defeated,” she said. H returned to the house she shared with her abuser, sleeping in her child’s room on the floor and continuing to face violence. On the night before she gave birth, she slept in the most secure room in the house: on the tile floor in the basement, with the family’s dogs.

Under a Missouri statute that has recently gained nationwide attention, every petitioner for divorce is required to disclose their pregnancy status. In practice, experts say, those who are pregnant are barred from legally dissolving their marriage. “The application [of the law] is an outright ban,” said Danielle Drake, attorney at Parks & Drake. When Drake learned her then husband was having an affair, her own divorce stalled because she was pregnant. Two other states have similar laws: Texas and Arkansas.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    8 months ago

    This is a very old law. It’s recently garnered attention, and while I don’t disagree with you, I don’t think the law by itself is a symptom of backsliding because it’s been around for a long time.

    • HeadfullofSoup@kbin.earth
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      Old law exist everywhere i have one where i live saying i can’t throw little people on sunday the symptom of backsliding is actually using the law

      • Tedrow@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        8 months ago

        Anti sodomy laws have been in place in many states for over 100 years. You are absolutely correct about enforcement.